Gemme G, Delogu A, Nobili F, Galeazzi G, Mariani P, Triglione P, Bonamico M
Istituto di Clinica Pediatrica G. Gaslini, Università di Genova, Italia.
Pediatr Med Chir. 1993 Nov-Dec;15(6):595-7.
We evaluated in parallel the action of antigliadin (AGA-IgA) and anti-endomysium (EmA) antibodies in a group of 144 coeliac patients during the various diagnostic procedures, and in 277 controls (206 affected by other gastroenterological diseases and 71 healthy or affected by non-gastroenterological diseases, not causing any immune changes). Little difference was observed between the two tests both during the initial phase of the disease and during gluten-free diet. No EmA positivity was observed in controls; AGA-IgA resulted positive in 6.3% of gastroenterological controls and in 5.6% of non-gastroenterological controls. Finally, the sensitivity, specificity and predictability of the two tests were evaluated in a sample of 92 subjects undergoing intestinal biopsy. The results show that the tests have the same sensitivity, but only for EmA 100% specificity was found.
我们在一组144例乳糜泻患者的各种诊断过程中,同时评估了抗麦醇溶蛋白抗体(AGA-IgA)和抗肌内膜抗体(EmA)的作用,并对277名对照者(206名患有其他胃肠疾病,71名健康或患有非胃肠疾病,未引起任何免疫变化)进行了评估。在疾病的初始阶段和无麸质饮食期间,两种检测方法之间几乎没有差异。在对照者中未观察到EmA阳性;AGA-IgA在6.3%的胃肠疾病对照者和5.6%的非胃肠疾病对照者中呈阳性。最后,在92例接受肠道活检的受试者样本中评估了两种检测方法的敏感性、特异性和可预测性。结果表明,两种检测方法具有相同的敏感性,但仅发现EmA具有100%的特异性。