Suppr超能文献

在不同呼气末正压水平通气的危重症患者中进行眼压的床旁评估。

Bedside evaluation of intraocular pressure in critically ill patients, ventilated at different levels of positive end-expiratory pressure.

作者信息

Spapen H D, D'Haese J, Diltoer M, Huyghens L P

机构信息

Critical Care and Anesthesiology Department, Academisch Ziekenhuis, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Belgium.

出版信息

Acta Anaesthesiol Belg. 1993;44(2):39-43.

PMID:8237295
Abstract

Animal experiments suggest that the application of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) levels > or = 10 cm H2O increase intraocular pressure (IOP), probably through ophthalmic and episcleral venous outflow obstruction secondary to PEEP-induced increase in central venous pressure (CVP). To evaluate whether a similar response occurs in humans, we studied the effects of varying levels of PEEP on IOP in 11 critically ill sedated and mechanically ventilated patients, aged 35 to 88 yrs (mean: 68 yrs), without evidence of ocular disease. Measured variables included PaCO2, PaO2, mean arterial pressure (MAP), CVP and IOP, and were recorded at zero end-expiratory pressure and at 5, 10 and 15 cm H2O PEEP, applied in random order. IOP was measured by the same investigator at the bedside, using a portable and battery-operated tonometer (Tono-Pen). As expected, PaO2 increased significantly from baseline at all PEEP levels. At the three levels of PEEP, no significant change of PaCO2 from its corresponding baseline values was observed. At 5 cm H2O PEEP neither CVP nor IOP raised significantly from baseline. IOP increased significantly (p < 0.01) from 12 +/- 4 to 14 +/- 4 mmHg at 10 cm H2O PEEP and from 13 +/- 4 to 16 +/- 5 mmHg at 15 cm H2O PEEP. CVP also increased significantly (p < 0.01) and in parallel with IOP at 10 and 15 cm H2O PEEP. Since IOP tends to rise significantly when PEEP levels exceed 10 cm H2O, PEEP-ventilated patients in whom such increase is undesirable might benefit from regular bedside IOP monitoring.

摘要

动物实验表明,呼气末正压(PEEP)水平≥10 cm H₂O 时会升高眼压(IOP),这可能是由于 PEEP 导致中心静脉压(CVP)升高,进而引起眼内和巩膜上静脉流出受阻。为评估人类是否会出现类似反应,我们研究了不同水平的 PEEP 对 11 例年龄在 35 至 88 岁(平均 68 岁)、无眼部疾病迹象的重症镇静且机械通气患者眼压的影响。测量的变量包括动脉血二氧化碳分压(PaCO₂)、动脉血氧分压(PaO₂)、平均动脉压(MAP)、CVP 和 IOP,并在呼气末压力为零以及分别施加 5、10 和 15 cm H₂O 的 PEEP 时记录,施加顺序随机。由同一名研究人员在床边使用便携式电池供电眼压计(Tono - Pen)测量 IOP。正如预期的那样,在所有 PEEP 水平下,PaO₂ 均较基线显著升高。在三个 PEEP 水平下,未观察到 PaCO₂ 与其相应基线值有显著变化。在 5 cm H₂O 的 PEEP 时,CVP 和 IOP 较基线均未显著升高。在 10 cm H₂O 的 PEEP 时,IOP 从 12 ± 4 mmHg 显著升高(p < 0.01)至 14 ± 4 mmHg,在 15 cm H₂O 的 PEEP 时,IOP 从 13 ± 4 mmHg 升高至 16 ± 5 mmHg。在 10 和 15 cm H₂O 的 PEEP 时,CVP 也显著升高(p < 0.01)且与 IOP 平行升高。由于当 PEEP 水平超过 10 cm H₂O 时眼压往往会显著升高,对于那些不希望出现这种眼压升高情况的接受 PEEP 通气的患者,定期进行床边眼压监测可能有益。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验