Davey D D, Nielsen M L, Frable W J, Rosenstock W, Lowell D M, Kraemer B B
Department of Pathology, University of Kentucky, Lexington.
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1993 Dec;117(12):1193-8.
The College of American Pathologists Interlaboratory Comparison Program in Cervicovaginal Cytology (PAP) is a quarterly mailed glass-slide quality improvement program. This growing program started as a pilot in 1989 with 207 laboratories. In 1991, 605 laboratories participated. The diagnostic menu is modified from the Bethesda System and divides referenced slides into a negative series (normal, infectious, and reactive) and a positive series of epithelial lesions. A facsimile option facilitates immediate educational feedback. The 1989 through 1991 major discrepancy rate averaged 5%. The consensus laboratory response had higher concordance than either pathologist or cytotechnologist responses. Low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion was the leading cause of false-negative participant response, while reactive/reparative change was the leading cause of false-positive response. Pathologist false-negative and false-positive responses from group or large case-volume practices were significantly lower than those from solo or small case-volume practices. Cytotechnologists in multiple-technologist or large-volume laboratories had significantly lower false-negative responses than solo technologists or those in low case-volume laboratories, but false-positive rates did not differ. Experienced participants had fewer major discrepancies. The Interlaboratory Comparison Program in Cervicovaginal Cytology illustrates the feasibility of a large, mailed glass-slide program, and offers laboratories a continuous method for monitoring and improving performance in gynecologic cytology.
美国病理学家学会宫颈阴道细胞学实验室间比对计划(PAP)是一项每季度邮寄玻璃切片的质量改进计划。这个不断发展的计划始于1989年的一项试点,当时有207个实验室参与。1991年,有605个实验室参与。诊断项目表是根据贝塞斯达系统修改的,将参考试片分为阴性系列(正常、感染性和反应性)和上皮病变阳性系列。传真选项便于立即提供教育反馈。1989年至1991年的主要差异率平均为5%。共识实验室的反应比病理学家或细胞技术人员的反应具有更高的一致性。低级别鳞状上皮内病变是参与者假阴性反应的主要原因,而反应性/修复性改变是假阳性反应的主要原因。来自团队或大量病例业务的病理学家假阴性和假阳性反应明显低于单人或小量病例业务的病理学家。在多名技术人员或大量病例的实验室中,细胞技术人员的假阴性反应明显低于单人技术人员或小量病例实验室的技术人员,但假阳性率没有差异。经验丰富的参与者有较少的主要差异。宫颈阴道细胞学实验室间比对计划说明了一项大型邮寄玻璃切片计划的可行性,并为实验室提供了一种持续监测和提高妇科细胞学表现的方法。