Suppr超能文献

[Importance of surgical masks for peroperative asepsis].

作者信息

Jepsen O B, Pers C, Lester A, Jensen A

机构信息

Centrale afdeling for sygehushygiejne, Statens Seruminstitut, København.

出版信息

Ugeskr Laeger. 1993 Jun 21;155(25):1940-2.

PMID:8317057
Abstract

For more than 70 years, the surgical mask has been used under operations as part of the maintenance of aseptic conditions in the operational field. Experiments with models and investigations of sources of infection carried out over the past 20 years have shown, however, that the bacterial flora of the upper respiratory tract do not contribute to airborne contamination of the surgical wound, but that persons who are situated directly beside the field may contaminate the wound directly by droplets released by speech, sneezing or coughing. Over the last ten years the usefulness of the surgical mask has been disputed several times, and a few controlled clinical trials have been able to confirm any benefits associated with use of surgical masks. There is therefore no reason from the point of view of preventing infection to maintain a general requirement for the use of surgical masks by others than those persons who may be situated within an arm's length of the operational field or instrument table.

摘要

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验