Hoerger T J, Waters T M
Department of Economics and Business Administration, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37235.
Med Care. 1993 Oct;31(10):879-97. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199310000-00003.
One of the key issues in implementing prospective Medicare fee schedules is how to set prices that accurately reflect competitive market forces. Competitive bidding has long been used in government procurement efforts for nonhealth services. In this paper, we evaluate how provider behavior will be affected if Medicare uses competitive bidding to set Medicare fee schedules. Our model provides several important insights about competitive bidding for health care services. First, the model shows that competitive bidding will lead to 2-stage competition between providers. In the bidding stage, providers will compete to submit winning bids. In the following stage, winning providers will compete for business through marketing efforts that may enhance quality. Second, the model shows how the design of the bidding mechanism affects bidding strategies and the importance of individual provisions within the design, such as penalties for losing bidders. Third, the model demonstrates how competitive bidding will affect quality. It shows how quality may deteriorate if the bidding mechanism chooses an exclusive winner and why naming multiple winners can keep quality at acceptable levels. Finally, we identify criteria for determining whether a particular type of Medicare service is well-suited for competitive bidding.
实施前瞻性医疗保险费用表的关键问题之一是如何设定准确反映竞争市场力量的价格。长期以来,竞争性招标一直用于非医疗服务的政府采购工作。在本文中,我们评估了如果医疗保险采用竞争性招标来设定医疗保险费用表,供应商行为将受到怎样的影响。我们的模型提供了关于医疗服务竞争性招标的几个重要见解。首先,该模型表明竞争性招标将导致供应商之间的两阶段竞争。在投标阶段,供应商将竞相提交中标标书。在接下来的阶段,中标供应商将通过可能提高质量的营销努力来争夺业务。其次,该模型展示了投标机制的设计如何影响投标策略以及设计中各个条款的重要性,例如对未中标者的处罚。第三,该模型演示了竞争性招标将如何影响质量。它展示了如果投标机制选择唯一的中标者,质量可能如何恶化,以及为什么指定多个中标者可以将质量保持在可接受的水平。最后,我们确定了判断特定类型的医疗保险服务是否适合竞争性招标的标准。