Similowski T, Gauthier A P, Yan S, Macklem P T, Bellemare F
Meakins-Christie Laboratories, Royal Victoria Hospital, McGill University Clinic, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Am Rev Respir Dis. 1993 Apr;147(4):850-6. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm/147.4.850.
The relative invasiveness of the balloon catheter technique in measuring twitch transdiaphragmatic pressure (Pdit) limits its clinical use. By phrenic stimulation we obtained swings in mouth pressure (Pmt) in six COPD patients (age 50 to 72, FEV1 18 to 48% of predicted) at relaxed FRC (rFRC) and during graded inspiratory efforts (IE; twitch occlusion, TO). At rFRC, Pmt was damped and time lagged relative to the esophageal pressure twitch (Pes(t)), as if pressure had equilibrated through an RC system. Pmt was not correlated with Pdit. Conversely, Pmt and Pes(t) were always well matched during IE [Pmt = 0.971 (SEM +/- 0.028) Pes(t), r > 0.89], possibly in relation to a decrease in upper airway compliance or more uniform pleural pressure swings. Pmt decreased with the level of voluntary diaphragmatic contraction (Pdivol) in proportion to Pdit, reflecting a progressive increase in the level of diaphragm activation. During IE, Pmt was closely related to the voluntary mouth pressure in five subjects but not in the remaining subject, indicating intersubject variability in the level of diaphragmatic recruitment relative to other inspiratory muscles. We submit that measuring Pm during inspiratory efforts upon which bilateral phrenic stimulation is superimposed offers a relatively simple method for the assessment of diaphragm activation, potentially applicable in the clinical field.
球囊导管技术在测量膈肌颤搐跨膈压(Pdit)时的相对侵入性限制了其临床应用。通过膈神经刺激,我们在6例慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者(年龄50至72岁,第一秒用力呼气容积(FEV1)为预测值的18%至48%)处于静息功能残气量(rFRC)时以及进行分级吸气努力(IE;颤搐阻断,TO)期间,获得了口腔压力(Pmt)的波动。在rFRC时,Pmt相对于食管压力颤搐(Pes(t))出现衰减且有时间延迟,就好像压力通过一个RC系统达到了平衡。Pmt与Pdit不相关。相反,在IE期间,Pmt和Pes(t)始终匹配良好[Pmt = 0.971(标准误±0.028)Pes(t),r > 0.89],这可能与上气道顺应性降低或胸膜压力波动更均匀有关。Pmt随着自主膈肌收缩水平(Pdivol)的升高而下降,与Pdit成比例,这反映了膈肌激活水平的逐渐增加。在IE期间,5名受试者的Pmt与自主口腔压力密切相关,但其余受试者并非如此,这表明相对于其他吸气肌,膈肌募集水平存在个体间差异。我们认为,在叠加双侧膈神经刺激的吸气努力过程中测量Pm,为评估膈肌激活提供了一种相对简单的方法,可能适用于临床领域。