Gibb D M
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, King's College Hospital Medical School, London, UK.
Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1993 Mar;100 Suppl 9:28-31. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1993.tb10633.x.
Intra-uterine pressure measurement remains the most objective way of measuring uterine activity in labour, and in this respect is superior to clinical assessment or external tocography. However there is little evidence to show that improving the assessment of uterine activity in labour is associated with an improvement in the outcome of labour for mother or fetus. It seems logical that use of intra-uterine pressure monitoring will provide additional safety in women with a scarred uterus, breech presentation, high parity, or apparent failure of response to induction or augmentation of labour with the usual dose rates of oxytocics, but this has not been established by appropriately sized clinical trials. Further research to establish the role of uterine activity measurement in labour is urgently needed.
子宫内压力测量仍然是衡量分娩时子宫活动的最客观方法,在这方面优于临床评估或外部宫缩图描记法。然而,几乎没有证据表明改善分娩时子宫活动的评估与改善母亲或胎儿的分娩结局有关。对于有子宫瘢痕、臀位、多产史,或对常规剂量缩宫素引产或加强宫缩反应明显不佳的女性,使用子宫内压力监测似乎能提供额外的安全保障,但这尚未得到规模适当的临床试验的确证。迫切需要进一步研究以确定子宫活动测量在分娩中的作用。