Gray R H, Kambic R T, Lanctot C A, Martin M C, Wesley R, Cremins R
Johns Hopkins University, School of Hygiene and Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland.
J Biosoc Sci. 1993 Apr;25(2):249-58. doi: 10.1017/s0021932000020538.
Studies to evaluate use-effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of natural family planning (NFP) were conducted in Liberia and Zambia. The Liberian programme provided uni-purpose NFP services to 1055 clients mainly in rural areas; the Zambian programme provided NFP services integrated with MCH to 2709 clients predominantly in urban areas. The one-year life table continuation and unplanned pregnancy rates were 78.9 and 4.3 per 100 woman-years in Liberia, compared to 71.2 and 8.9 in Zambia. However, high rates of loss to follow-up mandate caution in interpretation of these results, especially in Zambia. More women progressed to autonomous NFP use in Liberia (58%) than in Zambia (35.3%). However, programme costs per couple-year protection were lower in Zambia (US$25.7) than in Liberia (US$47.1). Costs per couple-year protection were higher during learning than autonomy, and declined over time. These studies suggest that NFP programmes can achieve acceptable use- and cost-effectiveness in Africa.
在利比里亚和赞比亚开展了评估自然计划生育(NFP)使用效果和成本效益的研究。利比里亚的项目主要为农村地区的1055名服务对象提供单一目的的自然计划生育服务;赞比亚的项目为主要位于城市地区的2709名服务对象提供与妇幼保健相结合的自然计划生育服务。利比里亚每100妇女年的一年生命表续用率和意外怀孕率分别为78.9和4.3,而赞比亚分别为71.2和8.9。然而,失访率很高,这使得在解释这些结果时需谨慎,尤其是在赞比亚。在利比里亚,更多妇女(58%)逐步实现自主使用自然计划生育,而在赞比亚这一比例为35.3%。然而,赞比亚每对夫妇年保护的项目成本(25.7美元)低于利比里亚(47.1美元)。学习期间每对夫妇年保护的成本高于自主使用期间,且随着时间推移而下降。这些研究表明,自然计划生育项目在非洲能够实现可接受的使用效果和成本效益。