Weitz J C
Departamento de Medicina, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Chile (Campus Occidente), Santiago de Chile.
Rev Med Chil. 1995 Mar;123(3):330-3.
ELISA techniques using monoclonal antibodies have been recently developed for the detection of Cryptosporidium parvum fecal antigens. The aim of this work was to compare the yield of these ELISA techniques with Ziehl-Nielsen and Safranin stains in formaldehyde-salt fixed samples. One hundred five fecal samples of patients with acute diarrhea were studied. Forty-seven samples did not contain Cryptosporidium and ELISA was negative. Also, ELISA was positive in 52 or 58 samples that contained Cryptosporidium (89.6%); the samples with false negative results contained scanty oocysts. Seven intensely positive Paf-fixed stool samples from AIDS patients with chronic diarrhea, were not reactive to ELISA. There was a good correlation between visually and mechanically read samples and there were no false positives. It is concluded that ELISA cannot be used in Paf-fixed samples and has a lower sensitivity that the stained commonly used for the diagnosis of cryptosporidiosis.
最近已开发出使用单克隆抗体的酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)技术来检测微小隐孢子虫粪便抗原。这项工作的目的是比较这些ELISA技术与齐-尼氏染色法和番红染色法在甲醛-盐固定样本中的检出率。研究了105例急性腹泻患者的粪便样本。47个样本不含隐孢子虫,ELISA检测为阴性。此外,在52或58个含有隐孢子虫的样本中ELISA检测呈阳性(89.6%);假阴性结果的样本中卵囊数量稀少。来自患有慢性腹泻的艾滋病患者的7个帕罗醛(Paf)固定的强阳性粪便样本对ELISA无反应。肉眼观察和机械读取的样本之间有良好的相关性,且无假阳性。得出的结论是,ELISA不能用于帕罗醛固定的样本,其敏感性低于常用于隐孢子虫病诊断的染色法。