Suppr超能文献

镫骨切除术与镫骨足板开窗术后的长期疗效比较。

Long-term results after stapedectomy versus stapedotomy.

作者信息

Kürsten R, Schneider B, Zrunek M

机构信息

ENT-Department KH Barmherzige Brüder, Vienna, Austria.

出版信息

Am J Otol. 1994 Nov;15(6):804-6.

PMID:8572096
Abstract

In a retrospective study postoperative hearing results after stapedotomy were compared with those after stapedectomy. Of 117 patients suffering from otosclerosis, 93 percent were primarily successfully operated between 1980 and 1990 in the ENT department of the University of Vienna. Long-term results from 35 stapedotomies and 22 stapedectomies were compared. Stapedotomy gave better results for high frequencies than stapedectomy. Whereas after stapedotomy no case of hearing loss could be observed, the incidence of anacusis after stapedectomy was 1.7 percent. Therefore, it is concluded that stapedotomy should be the preferred surgical technique in the treatment of otosclerosis.

摘要

在一项回顾性研究中,对镫骨切开术后与镫骨切除术后的听力结果进行了比较。在117例耳硬化症患者中,93%于1980年至1990年间在维也纳大学耳鼻喉科接受了初次成功手术。对35例镫骨切开术和22例镫骨切除术的长期结果进行了比较。镫骨切开术在高频方面的效果优于镫骨切除术。镫骨切开术后未观察到听力损失病例,而镫骨切除术后全聋的发生率为1.7%。因此,得出结论,镫骨切开术应成为治疗耳硬化症的首选手术技术。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验