Hayes S C, Wilson K G
Department of Psychology, University of Nevada, Reno 89557-0062, USA.
J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 1995 Sep;26(3):241-8. doi: 10.1016/0005-7916(95)00024-t.
Cognitive and behavioral psychology have long debated the merits of cognitive causality in the explanation of human behavior. We argue, however, that cognitive causality must be understood in the context of the pre-analytic philosophical assumptions of the scientist, not merely as an empirical matter. Many of the issues that seemingly separate cognitive from behavioral positions cannot be answered by research. We briefly present Relational Frame Theory, which is a behavioral approach to language and cognition. RFT is not subject to the same criticisms made by Bandura of behavior analytic thinking. Finally, we describe some aspects of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy as an example of the applied implications of this contextual analysis of cognition.
认知心理学和行为心理学长期以来一直在争论认知因果关系在解释人类行为方面的价值。然而,我们认为,认知因果关系必须在科学家的前分析哲学假设的背景下理解,而不仅仅是一个经验问题。许多看似将认知立场与行为立场区分开来的问题无法通过研究来回答。我们简要介绍关系框架理论,它是一种关于语言和认知的行为方法。关系框架理论不会受到班杜拉对行为分析思维所提出的同样批评。最后,我们描述接纳与承诺疗法的一些方面,作为这种认知情境分析应用意义的一个例子。