Suppr超能文献

雅培Cell DYN 3500五分类血液分析仪的实验室评估。

Laboratory evaluation of the Abbott Cell DYN 3500 5-part differential.

作者信息

Fournier M, Gireau A, Chretien M C, Ghevaert C, Boniface B, Goudemand J, Cosson A

机构信息

Laboratoire d'hématologie, Centre Hospitalier Régional et Universitaie, Lille, France.

出版信息

Am J Clin Pathol. 1996 Mar;105(3):286-92. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/105.3.286.

Abstract

The study reports the performance of the Abbott CD3500 automated hematology analyzer for the enumeration and delineation of leukocyte populations for both adult and pediatric samples, and the ability of this instrument to detect the presence of abnormal cells. Samples from 542 individual patients either attending medical practitioners or during hospitalization were examined and then subdivided for the purposes of this study into 106 samples from newborn infants (< days), 145 samples from older children (15 days to 14 years) with non-oncologic disorders, 100 samples from normal adults, and 191 samples from oncology patient (97 adults and 94 children). The leukocyte differentials provided by both the Abbott CD3500 and the Coulter STKS were compared with those obtained from conventional morphology (two observers, total of 400 leukocytes). The sensitivities and specificities of the blast, immature granulocyte (IG) and NRBC "flags" were also determined. For the non-oncology adult (n=100) and pediatric (n=145) cohorts, automated differentials were given in all samples with the CD3500, whereas the STKS did not provide a differential analysis for 20 of the 145 (14%) pediatric samples, 11 of these were absent for no obvious reason. However, for the evaluable cases, the performances of the CD3500 and the STKS were broadly similar and generally correlated well with the manual reference procedure. The results for the newborn samples were less consistent with wider 95% confidence intervals (CI) noted. For example, the CD3500 (which reported a differential for all 106 samples studied) gave CI values of +/-14.4% for neutrophils, +/-14.6% for lymphocytes and +/-8.1% for monocytes. For comparison, the STKS (which did not provide a differential in 15% of 79 samples analyzed; insufficient material being available from the remaining 27 of 106 newborn samples) gave CI values of +/-21.9% for neutrophils, +/-23.5% for lymphocytes and +/-8.2% for monocytes. For all samples, the sensitivity of the blast flag on the CD3500 was 85% with a specificity of 91% (STKS: sensitivity, 75%; specificity, 85%); the sensitivity of the CD3500 IG flag was 72% with a specificity of 76% (STKS: sensitivity, 75%: specificity, 73%); and the sensitivity of the NRBC flag was 43% with a specificity of 94%(STKS sensitivity, 37%; specificity, 88%). This study confirms competitive performance levels for the CD3500 in the analysis of normal adult samples and suggests positive performance advantages in the study of neonatal, pediatric, and leukopenic samples.

摘要

该研究报告了雅培CD3500全自动血液分析仪对成人和儿科样本中白细胞群体的计数和分类情况,以及该仪器检测异常细胞的能力。对542名个体患者的样本进行了检查,这些患者或是就诊患者,或是住院患者。为了本研究的目的,这些样本被细分为:106份来自新生儿(<1天)的样本、145份来自患有非肿瘤性疾病的大龄儿童(15天至14岁)的样本、100份来自正常成年人的样本以及191份来自肿瘤患者(97名成人和94名儿童)的样本。将雅培CD3500和库尔特STKS提供的白细胞分类结果与通过传统形态学方法(两名观察者,共400个白细胞)获得的结果进行了比较。还确定了原始细胞、未成熟粒细胞(IG)和有核红细胞“标记”的敏感性和特异性。对于非肿瘤成人(n = 100)和儿科(n = 145)队列,CD3500在所有样本中都给出了自动分类结果,而STKS没有对145份儿科样本中的20份(14%)进行分类分析,其中11份没有明显原因就缺失了分类结果。然而,对于可评估的病例,CD3500和STKS的性能大致相似,并且总体上与手工参考程序相关性良好。新生儿样本的结果不太一致,95%置信区间(CI)更宽。例如,CD3500(对所研究的所有106份样本都给出了分类结果)给出的中性粒细胞CI值为±14.4%,淋巴细胞为±14.6%,单核细胞为±8.1%。相比之下,STKS(在分析的79份样本中有15%没有给出分类结果;在106份新生儿样本中的其余27份中没有足够的材料)给出的中性粒细胞CI值为±21.9%,淋巴细胞为±23.5%,单核细胞为±8.2%。对于所有样本,CD3500上原始细胞标记的敏感性为85%,特异性为91%(STKS:敏感性75%;特异性85%);CD3500的IG标记敏感性为72%,特异性为76%(STKS:敏感性75%;特异性73%);有核红细胞标记的敏感性为43%,特异性为94%(STKS敏感性37%;特异性88%)。这项研究证实了CD3500在正常成人样本分析中的竞争性能水平,并表明在新生儿、儿科和白细胞减少样本的研究中具有积极的性能优势。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验