Cotton D J, Soparkar G R, Grahan B L
Department of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan College of Medicine, Saskatoon, Canada.
Med Clin North Am. 1996 May;80(3):549-64. doi: 10.1016/s0025-7125(05)70453-3.
CAL remains an important cause of morbidity and mortality. The diffusing capacity has ranked high in the assessment of CAL because it represents the best pulmonary function test to assess the integrity of the pulmonary capillary bed. Unfortunately, numerous physiologic, pathologic, and technical factors affect the test, thus limiting its sensitivity and specificity. HRCT techniques offer the potential to assess the extent of emphysema more accurately, but the technique requires greater standardization and is more expensive and less noninvasive than DLcoSB testing. Although the CIBA symposium considered DLcoSB "essential" in the investigation of the CAL patient, 16 the use of conventional DLcoSB testing in the seated position at rest is not currently advised as a routine screening procedure. The test must be performed in a center with high degree of quality control, and the results can be of value only by integrating the result into a comprehensive clinical assessment. Within this context, conventional DLcoSB testing may provide limited information about the extent of emphysema because reductions in DLcoSB correlate with the extent of emphysema by HRCT. When DLcoSB is normal, it may point in the direction of considering asthma as the cause of the airflow limitation. It may also provide information about disease severity and prognosis in O2-dependent CAL patients. The test should be a part of the investigation of the patient with unexplained dyspnea. It remains controversial how emphysema correlates with the degree of impairment in CAL, and further work needs to be done to clarify this relationship. This requires a reexamination of current CT methods 110 and the relationship between DLcoSB, structural changes in the lung, and HRCT evidence of emphysema. Refinements in DLcoSB testing methods, such as the measurement of DLcoSB-3EQ are linked to rapidly responding CO analyzers and computer-driven software, which will potentially improve the accuracy and reproducibility of the test, particularly in the presence of airway obstruction and nonuniform distribution of ventilation. Such refinements, which offer the possibility that tests of diffusion could become more useful markers of disease, include measuring DLcoSB when the pulmonary capillary recruitment is near maximal (head-down position, exercise), enhancing the sensitivity of the test to alterations in the lung periphery, standardizing previous volume history, developing more precise corrections for Hb and COHb, and developing an index of diffusion nonuniformity.
慢性阻塞性肺疾病(CAL)仍然是发病和死亡的重要原因。在CAL评估中,弥散能力一直占据重要地位,因为它是评估肺毛细血管床完整性的最佳肺功能测试。不幸的是,众多生理、病理和技术因素会影响该测试,从而限制了其敏感性和特异性。高分辨率计算机断层扫描(HRCT)技术有可能更准确地评估肺气肿的程度,但该技术需要更高的标准化,且比单次呼吸一氧化碳弥散量(DLcoSB)测试更昂贵且侵入性更强。尽管CIBA研讨会认为DLcoSB在CAL患者的调查中“必不可少”,但目前不建议将静息坐位时的传统DLcoSB测试作为常规筛查程序。该测试必须在质量控制水平高的中心进行,并且只有将结果纳入全面的临床评估中,结果才有价值。在此背景下,传统的DLcoSB测试可能只能提供关于肺气肿程度的有限信息,因为DLcoSB的降低与HRCT显示的肺气肿程度相关。当DLcoSB正常时,可能指向将哮喘视为气流受限原因的方向。它还可能提供有关依赖氧气的CAL患者疾病严重程度和预后的信息。该测试应成为不明原因呼吸困难患者调查的一部分。肺气肿与CAL损伤程度之间的关系仍存在争议,需要进一步开展工作来阐明这种关系。这需要重新审视当前的CT方法以及DLcoSB、肺结构变化和肺气肿的HRCT证据之间的关系。DLcoSB测试方法的改进,如使用与快速响应一氧化碳分析仪和计算机驱动软件相关联的DLcoSB - 3EQ测量,有望提高测试的准确性和可重复性,特别是在存在气道阻塞和通气分布不均匀的情况下。这些改进措施有可能使弥散测试成为更有用的疾病标志物,包括在肺毛细血管募集接近最大时(头低位、运动时)测量DLcoSB,提高测试对肺周边变化的敏感性,标准化先前的容量历史,开发更精确的血红蛋白(Hb)和碳氧血红蛋白(COHb)校正方法,以及开发弥散不均匀指数。