Suppr超能文献

不同EWS嵌合转录本的表达是否能界定尤因肿瘤患者临床上不同的风险组?

Does expression of different EWS chimeric transcripts define clinically distinct risk groups of Ewing tumor patients?

作者信息

Zoubek A, Dockhorn-Dworniczak B, Delattre O, Christiansen H, Niggli F, Gatterer-Menz I, Smith T L, Jürgens H, Gadner H, Kovar H

机构信息

Children's Cancer Research Institute, St Anna Children's Hospital, Vienna, Austria.

出版信息

J Clin Oncol. 1996 Apr;14(4):1245-51. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1996.14.4.1245.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Because of the high heterogeneity of EWS gene fusions with FLI1 and ERG genes due to variable chromosomal breakpoint locations in Ewing tumors (ET) (14 different chimeric transcripts identified so far), we evaluated the clinical impact of the expression of diverse fusion transcripts in ET patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In a European multicenter study, 147 ET were analyzed by reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and the molecular data statistically compared with all clinical data available.

RESULTS

Most tumors expressed chimeric transcripts with fusion of EWS exon 7 to FLI1 exon 6 (75 of 147) (type I) or five (39 of 147) and EWS exon 10 to FLI1 exon 5 (eight of 147) or 6 (five of 147). In five cases, chimerism between EWS exon 9 and FLI1 exons 4 and EWS exon 7 and FLI1 exon 7 or 8 was observed. Fifteen cases of EWS-ERG rearrangement were identified. In 85 of these patients treated in the European Cooperative Ewing Sarcoma Studies, molecular results were analyzed in comparison to age, sex, tumor localization, tumor volume, and disease extension. No significant correlation between the various fusion types and these features were observed. Relapse-free survival (RFS) for the 31 patients with localized disease and fusion type I tended to be longer compared with the 24 patients with localized tumors bearing other chimeric transcripts (P = .04).

CONCLUSION

Results suggest a possible advantage in PFS for patients with localized disease and fusion type I transcripts, although this will require prospective validation with a larger number of patients and longer follow-up periods.

摘要

目的

由于尤因肿瘤(ET)中EWS基因与FLI1和ERG基因的融合存在高度异质性,这是由EWS基因在染色体上可变的断点位置导致的(目前已鉴定出14种不同的嵌合转录本),我们评估了不同融合转录本的表达对ET患者的临床影响。

患者与方法

在一项欧洲多中心研究中,通过逆转录聚合酶链反应(RT-PCR)对147例ET进行分析,并将分子数据与所有可用的临床数据进行统计学比较。

结果

大多数肿瘤表达的嵌合转录本为EWS外显子7与FLI1外显子6融合(147例中的75例)(I型),或EWS外显子10与FLI1外显子5融合(147例中的39例),或EWS外显子10与FLI1外显子6融合(147例中的8例)。在5例中,观察到EWS外显子9与FLI1外显子4以及EWS外显子7与FLI1外显子七或八之间的嵌合现象。鉴定出15例EWS-ERG重排。在欧洲尤因肉瘤协作研究中接受治疗的85例患者中,对分子结果与年龄、性别、肿瘤定位、肿瘤体积和疾病分期进行了比较分析。未观察到不同融合类型与这些特征之间存在显著相关性。31例局限性疾病且融合类型为I的患者的无复发生存期(RFS)相较于24例局限性肿瘤携带其他嵌合转录本的患者往往更长(P = 0.04)。

结论

结果表明,局限性疾病且融合类型为I转录本的患者在无进展生存期(PFS)方面可能具有优势,尽管这需要更多患者和更长随访期的前瞻性验证。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验