Sehested M, Jensen P B
Department of Pathology, Sundby Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Biochem Pharmacol. 1996 Apr 12;51(7):879-86. doi: 10.1016/0006-2952(95)02241-4.
The complex catalytic cycle of topoisomerase II is the target of important antitumor agents. Topoisomerase II poisons, such as etoposide and daunorubicin, inhibit the resealing of DNA breaks created by the enzyme. This enzyme-coupled cell kill is susceptible to pharmacological regulation by drugs interfering with other steps in the enzyme's catalytic cycle (i.e. so-called catalytic inhibitors). From in vitro studies, is appears that there are 2 distinct sites in the cycle at which a complete antagonism of the toxicity of topoisomerase II poisons can be obtained. The first is the inhibition of the enzyme's binding to its DNA substrate as seen with intercalating drugs such as chloroquine and aclarubicin; a second, more specific, interaction is elicited by bisdioxopiperazines, which are thought to lock the homodimeric topoisomerase II in the form of a closed bracelet surrounding the DNA at the postreligation step. To investigate these in vitro findings in the more complex whole cell system, we studied enzyme-DNA binding in Western blots of 0.35 M NaCL nuclear extracts from human small cell lung cancer OC-NYH cells incubated with the bisdioxopiperazine ICRF-187 and aclarubicin. With ICRF-187, we found a reversible ATP dependent decrease in the extractable levels of both the alpha and the beta isoforms of topoisomerase II. In contrast to ICRF-187, aclarubicin increased the amount of extractable enzyme from cells. Further, when using the terpenoid clerocidin, which differs from conventional topoisomerase II poisons by forming a salt-and heat-stable inhibition of DNA resealing, no antagonism was found by ICRF-187 on formation of DNA strand breaks and cytotoxicity. However, aclarubicin, which interferes early in the topoisomerase II catalytic cycle, was able to antagonize DNA breaks and cytotoxicity caused by clerocidin. The results indicate 4 different steps in the topoisomerase II cycle that can be uncoupled in the cell by different drug types: etoposide and clerocidin cause reversible and irreversible inhibition of DNA resealing, respectively, and DNA intercalating agents, such as aclarubicin, inhibit binding of topoisomerase II enzyme to its DNA substrate. Finally, bisdioxopiperazines as ICRF-187 partake in an energy dependent inappropriate binding of topoisomerase II to DNA after the resealing step. This knowledge may enable the design of rational combinations of topoisomerase II poisons and catalytic inhibitors to enhance the efficacy of anticancer therapy.
拓扑异构酶II复杂的催化循环是重要抗肿瘤药物的作用靶点。拓扑异构酶II毒药,如依托泊苷和柔红霉素,会抑制该酶产生的DNA断裂的重新封闭。这种酶偶联的细胞杀伤作用易受干扰该酶催化循环中其他步骤的药物(即所谓的催化抑制剂)的药理调节。从体外研究来看,似乎在该循环中有两个不同的位点,在这些位点可以完全拮抗拓扑异构酶II毒药的毒性。第一个位点是酶与DNA底物结合的抑制,如插入性药物氯喹和阿柔比星所见;第二个更特异的相互作用是由双二氧哌嗪引发的,双二氧哌嗪被认为在重新连接步骤将同二聚体拓扑异构酶II锁定为围绕DNA的封闭手镯形式。为了在更复杂的全细胞系统中研究这些体外研究结果,我们在用双二氧哌嗪ICRF - 187和阿柔比星孵育的人小细胞肺癌OC - NYH细胞的0.35M NaCl核提取物的蛋白质印迹中研究了酶与DNA的结合。使用ICRF - 187时,我们发现拓扑异构酶II的α和β同工型的可提取水平均出现可逆的ATP依赖性降低。与ICRF - 187相反,阿柔比星增加了细胞中可提取酶的量。此外,当使用萜类化合物clerocidin时,它与传统的拓扑异构酶II毒药不同,通过形成盐和热稳定抑制DNA重新封闭,ICRF - 187未发现对DNA链断裂形成和细胞毒性有拮抗作用。然而,在拓扑异构酶II催化循环早期起干扰作用的阿柔比星能够拮抗clerocidin引起的DNA断裂和细胞毒性。结果表明拓扑异构酶II循环中有4个不同步骤可被不同类型的药物在细胞中解偶联:依托泊苷和clerocidin分别引起DNA重新封闭的可逆和不可逆抑制,而DNA插入剂,如阿柔比星,抑制拓扑异构酶II酶与DNA底物的结合。最后,像ICRF - 187这样的双二氧哌嗪在重新连接步骤后参与拓扑异构酶II与DNA的能量依赖性不适当结合。这些知识可能有助于设计拓扑异构酶II毒药和催化抑制剂的合理组合,以提高抗癌治疗的疗效。