Goerig M, Beck H
Abteilung für Anästhesiologie, Universitäts-Krankenhaus Eppendorf, Hamburg.
Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther. 1996 Mar;31(2):111-9. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-995885.
The history of anaesthesiology like that of other medical branches has not been free of quarrels concerning priority. International disputes between the surgeon August Bier from Kiel and his former colleague August Hildebrandt concerning the question of who was the actual inventor of spinal anesthesia have almost fallen into oblivion. While Hildebrandt and numerous other colleagues frequently stated that the New York neurologist James Leonhardt Corning was the inventor of spinal anesthesia, Bier insisted on having described and developed this method first and without any knowledge of Corning's experiments. Corning's use of the term "spinal anesthesia" in his publications probably caused the error that he was the first to describe and apply this new widespread technique. Only recently, American scientists emphasized the fact that this is not true. There will, unfortunately, not be an answer to the Question why Hildebrandt started this quarrel about priority. His reason might have been hurt feelings as he had not been mentioned as co-author in Bier's epoch-making survey.
与其他医学分支一样,麻醉学的历史也不乏关于优先权的争论。来自基尔的外科医生奥古斯特·比尔与其前同事奥古斯特·希尔德布兰特就脊髓麻醉的实际发明者问题产生的国际争端几乎已被遗忘。虽然希尔德布兰特和许多其他同事经常表示,纽约神经学家詹姆斯·莱昂哈特·康宁是脊髓麻醉的发明者,但比尔坚称自己首先描述并开发了这种方法,而且对康宁的实验一无所知。康宁在其出版物中使用了“脊髓麻醉”一词,这可能导致了一种错误看法,即他是第一个描述并应用这种新的广泛使用的技术的人。直到最近,美国科学家才强调这并非事实。不幸的是,对于希尔德布兰特为何挑起这场关于优先权的争论,我们无法给出答案。他的理由可能是自尊心受到了伤害,因为在比尔具有划时代意义的调查报告中,他没有被列为共同作者。