Erdoes L S, Marek J M, Mills J L, Berman S S, Whitehill T, Hunter G C, Feinberg W, Krupski W
Section of Neurology, University of Arizona College of Medicine, Tucson, USA.
J Vasc Surg. 1996 May;23(5):950-6. doi: 10.1016/s0741-5214(96)70262-8.
Recent reports suggest that 80% to 90% of patients can safely undergo carotid endarterectomy on the basis of duplex scanning alone without cerebral angiography. Other investigators have recommended that a complementary imaging study such as magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) also be obtained.
We prospectively evaluated 103 consecutive patients with carotid occlusive disease. Eighty percent of patients were symptomatic. All 103 patients underwent duplex scanning and arteriography. Additional noninvasive tests included computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and MRA in 50%, 56%, and 48% of patients, respectively. At a multispecialty conference all studies except angiograms were reviewed, and a treatment decision was made by a panel of attending vascular surgeons, neurosurgeons, and neurologists. The cerebral angiograms then were reviewed and changes made to final treatment plans were noted.
After review of noninvasive studies, 30 of 103 of patients (29%) were believed to require arteriography because of diagnostic uncertainty of carotid occlusion in three patients, suggestion of nonatherosclerotic disease in four, suggestion of proximal disease in two, suboptimal noninvasive studies in one, and uncertainty of therapy despite good-quality noninvasive studies in 20 patients primarily with borderline stenoses and unclear symptoms. In 10 of these 30 patients (33%) management decisions were changed on the basis of angiogram results. Of the remaining 73 patients (71%) in whom the panel felt comfortable proceeding with operative or medical therapy without angiography, only one patient (1.4%) would have had management altered by results of angiography. MRA results concurred with duplex findings in 92% of studies, but did not alter management in any patient.
In patients with good-quality duplex images, focal atherosclerotic bifurcation disease, and clear clinical presentation, treatment decisions can be made without arteriography. In 30% of patients angiography is useful in clarifying decisionmaking. MRA is unlikely to influence management decisions and is thus rarely indicated.
最近的报告表明,80%至90%的患者仅基于双功超声扫描而无需脑血管造影就能安全地接受颈动脉内膜切除术。其他研究者建议也应进行诸如磁共振血管造影(MRA)之类的补充性影像学检查。
我们对103例连续性颈动脉闭塞性疾病患者进行了前瞻性评估。80%的患者有症状。所有103例患者均接受了双功超声扫描和动脉造影。另外的非侵入性检查分别在50%、56%和48%的患者中进行了计算机断层扫描、磁共振成像和MRA。在一次多专科会议上,除血管造影片外的所有检查均被审查,由一组主治血管外科医生、神经外科医生和神经科医生做出治疗决定。然后审查脑血管造影片,并记录最终治疗计划的变更情况。
在对非侵入性检查进行审查后,103例患者中有30例(29%)被认为需要进行动脉造影,原因如下:3例患者颈动脉闭塞的诊断存在不确定性,4例提示非动脉粥样硬化性疾病,2例提示近端疾病,1例非侵入性检查结果欠佳,20例主要是临界狭窄且症状不明确的患者尽管非侵入性检查质量良好但治疗仍存在不确定性。在这30例患者中有10例(33%)根据血管造影结果改变了治疗决策。在其余73例(71%)专家组认为无需血管造影即可进行手术或药物治疗的患者中,只有1例患者(1.4%)的治疗会因血管造影结果而改变。MRA结果在92%的检查中与双功超声检查结果一致,但未改变任何患者的治疗决策。
对于具有高质量双功超声图像、局灶性动脉粥样硬化性分叉病变且临床表现明确的患者,无需动脉造影即可做出治疗决策。在30%的患者中,血管造影有助于明确决策。MRA不太可能影响治疗决策,因此很少需要进行。