Suppr超能文献

[外照射放疗与镭疗联合治疗腭扁桃体区癌的价值。对361例患者的系列统计研究]

[Value of the combination of external radiotherapy and curietherapy in carcinoma of the velo-tonsillar region. Statistical study of a series of 361 patients].

作者信息

Pernot M, Hoffstetter S, Malissard L, Luporsi E, Peiffert D, Aletti P, Marchal C, Kozminski P, Bey P

机构信息

Centre Alexis-Vautrin, Vandoeuvre-les-Nancy, France.

出版信息

Bull Cancer Radiother. 1996;83(1):40-6.

PMID:8679280
Abstract

From 1977 to 1991, we treated 361 carcinomas of the velotonsillar region, either by brachytherapy alone (18 cases), or by an association of external radiotherapy and brachytherapy (343 patients). The latter was performed using a special technique with iridium wires in plastic tubes with afterloading. The primary was the tonsil in 128 patients, the soft palate in 134 patients. We numbered also 9 posterior pillars, 63 anterior pillars and 27 velotonsillar sulcus. According to the UICC staging system (28), we classified the patients in 90 T1, 141 T2, 119 T3, 2 T4, 9 Tx with 230 N0, 93 N1, 9 N2, 20 N3 and 9 Nx. The results at 5 and 10 years show respectively: local control (LC) 80% and 75%, locoregional control 75% and 70%, global survival 53% and 28%, specific survival 63% and 52%. The univariate study shows at 5 years a better local control for T1-T2 (87%) than for T3 (67%) with p = 0.00004. The locoregional control is better for N0 (80%) than for N+ (66%) with p = 0.002, this is the same for global survival (59% versus 42%, p = 0.002). The two groups were individualised according to the primary. Inside each of these groups, the prognosis is identical for different localisations, which allows to put them together. We can therefore distinguish a group A which includes the tonsil, the soft palate and posterior pillar. This group has a better prognosis (controls and survivals) than group B (anterior pillar and velotonsillar sulcus) (p < 0.002). The tumours extended to the mobile tongue, the base of the tongue or the velotonsillar sulcus have a poorer prognosis than those without propagation or with an upwards propagation (p < 0.002). The statistical study of radiobiological factors that can influence the tissular repair shows that there are less recurrences if the duration of treatment is inferior to 55 days and if the interval between external irradiation and brachytherapy is inferior to 20 days. A sufficient safety margin seems also necessary for a good local control. The dose rate within the limits used does not seem to influence the local control and the total dose delivered to the tumour, but this is not surprising since the highest doses are given to the tumours with the smallest regression during external irradiation. The multivariate study for local control shows that the most significant factors are the T, the tumoral localisation and the total duration of treatment. For complications (classified in 4 stages), the dose rate is the most significant factor.

摘要

1977年至1991年期间,我们共治疗了361例腭扁桃体区癌,其中18例仅采用近距离放疗,343例采用外照射与近距离放疗联合治疗。后者采用一种特殊技术,即使用塑料导管内的铱丝进行后装治疗。128例患者的原发部位为扁桃体,134例为软腭。此外还有9例为后柱、63例为前柱、27例为腭扁桃体沟。根据国际抗癌联盟(UICC)分期系统(28),我们将患者分为:90例T1期、141例T2期、119例T3期、2例T4期、9例Tx期,伴有230例N0期、93例N1期、9例N2期、20例N3期和9例Nx期。5年和10年的结果分别显示:局部控制率(LC)为80%和75%,区域控制率为75%和70%,总生存率为53%和28%,特异性生存率为63%和52%。单因素研究显示,5年时T1 - T2期的局部控制率(87%)优于T3期(67%),p = 0.00004。区域控制率N0期(80%)优于N +期(66%),p = 0.002,总生存率也是如此(59%对42%,p = 0.002)。根据原发部位将两组患者个体化。在每组中,不同部位的预后相同,因此可以将它们合并。因此,我们可以区分出A组,包括扁桃体、软腭和后柱。该组的预后(控制率和生存率)优于B组(前柱和腭扁桃体沟)(p < 0.002)。肿瘤扩展至活动舌、舌根或腭扁桃体沟的预后比无扩散或向上扩散的肿瘤差(p < 0.002)。对可能影响组织修复的放射生物学因素的统计学研究表明,如果治疗持续时间少于55天且外照射与近距离放疗之间的间隔少于20天,则复发较少。为了实现良好的局部控制,似乎也需要足够的安全边界。在所使用的剂量率范围内,似乎不会影响局部控制和给予肿瘤的总剂量,但这并不奇怪,因为在外部照射期间,对退缩最小的肿瘤给予了最高剂量。局部控制的多因素研究表明,最重要的因素是T分期、肿瘤部位和治疗总持续时间。对于并发症(分为4个阶段),剂量率是最重要的因素。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验