Suppr超能文献

社区动脉粥样硬化风险研究中玫瑰心绞痛问卷的重复性和有效性

Repeatability and validity of the Rose questionnaire for angina pectoris in the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study.

作者信息

Sorlie P D, Cooper L, Schreiner P J, Rosamond W, Szklo M

机构信息

Epidemiology and Biometry Program, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Epidemiol. 1996 Jul;49(7):719-25. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(96)00022-4.

Abstract

Angina pectoris (AP) as determined by the Rose questionnaire was assessed in nearly 16,000 black and white men and women participating in the Atherosclerosis Risk in communities Study, a population study of cardiovascular disease in four communities. The questionnaire was administered at yearly intervals and estimates of repeatability were made. Validity was assessed indirectly by comparing Rose AP to risk factors, prevalent heart disease, medication use, and thickness of carotid artery walls as measured by B-mode ultrasound. Using kappa statistics for agreement of positive Rose AP determinations taken 1 year apart, white men show a higher level of agreement than white women (average kappa 0.36 for white men, 0.30 for white women), and whites show a higher level of agreement than blacks (average kappa 0.23 and 0.22 for black men and women, respectively). Rose AP that persists for more than one determination is associated with thicker carotid artery walls, greater amounts of cigarette smoking, greater prevalence of reported heart attack, and greater use of chest pain medications. A single determination of severe Rose AP is also associated with thicker carotid artery walls. These data suggest that multiple reports and the more severe grading of Rose AP (pain reported while walking on the level) are likely to indicate more severe disease; however, a single report using the Rose questionnaire appears valid, i.e., moderately associated with disease and risk factors, and appropriate for use in epidemiological studies.

摘要

在一项针对四个社区心血管疾病的人群研究——社区动脉粥样硬化风险研究中,对近16000名黑人和白人男性及女性进行了评估,以确定通过罗斯问卷诊断的心绞痛(AP)情况。该问卷每年发放一次,并对重复性进行了评估。通过将罗斯心绞痛与风险因素、心脏病患病率、药物使用情况以及通过B超测量的颈动脉壁厚度进行比较,间接评估了其有效性。使用kappa统计量来衡量相隔1年的罗斯心绞痛阳性诊断结果的一致性,白人男性的一致性水平高于白人女性(白人男性平均kappa值为0.36,白人女性为0.30),白人的一致性水平高于黑人(黑人男性和女性的平均kappa值分别为0.23和0.22)。多次诊断持续存在的罗斯心绞痛与颈动脉壁增厚、吸烟量增加、报告的心脏病发作患病率更高以及胸痛药物使用量增加有关。单次诊断为重度罗斯心绞痛也与颈动脉壁增厚有关。这些数据表明,多次报告以及罗斯心绞痛的更严重分级(在平地上行走时报告疼痛)可能表明疾病更严重;然而,使用罗斯问卷进行单次报告似乎是有效的,即与疾病和风险因素有中度关联,适用于流行病学研究。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验