Popkin B M, Siega-Riz A M, Haines P S
Department of Nutrition, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27516-3997, USA.
N Engl J Med. 1996 Sep 5;335(10):716-20. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199609053351006.
There may be dietary differences among racial and socioeconomic groups in the United States.
Using data from a representative sample of adults, we compared dietary trends among blacks and whites of varying socioeconomic status. We developed comparable measures of diet and of the consumption of macronutrients and food groups for 6061 participants in the 1965 Nationwide Food Consumption Surveys, 16,425 in the 1977-1978 Nationwide Food Consumption Surveys, and 9920 in the 1989-1991 Continuing Survey of Food Intake by Individuals (all conducted by the U.S. Department of Agriculture). The primary outcome was the score (range, 0 to 16) on the Diet Quality Index, a composite of eight food-and-nutrient-based recommendations from the National Academy of Sciences. A score of 4 or less was considered to indicate a relatively more healthful diet, and a value of 10 or more a relatively less healthful diet.
Overall dietary quality improved in all groups, from a mean Diet Quality Index score of 7.4 in 1965 to 6.4 in 1989-1991. In 1965, blacks of low socioeconomic status and, to a lesser extent, whites of low socioeconomic status had better diets than whites of high socioeconomic status. By the 1989-1991 survey, the differences among racial and socioeconomic groups had narrowed. In 1965, 9.3 percent of whites of low socioeconomic status, 16.4 percent of blacks of low socioeconomic status, and 4.7 percent of whites of high socioeconomic status had mean scores of 4 or less. In the 1989-1991 survey the respective percentages were 19.9, 23.5, and 20.0. Fat consumption decreased in all groups. The consumption of fruits and vegetables varied little over time, except for an increase among blacks of medium and high socioeconomic status. The consumption of grains and legumes increased over time among whites of medium and high socioeconomic status and declined among blacks of low socioeconomic status.
In 1965, there were large differences among groups in dietary quality, with whites of high socioeconomic status eating the least healthful diet, as measured by the index, and blacks of low socioeconomic status the most healthful. By the 1989-1991 survey, the diets of all groups had improved and were relatively similar.
在美国,不同种族和社会经济群体之间可能存在饮食差异。
我们利用成年人代表性样本的数据,比较了不同社会经济地位的黑人和白人的饮食趋势。我们为1965年全国食物消费调查中的6061名参与者、1977 - 1978年全国食物消费调查中的16425名参与者以及1989 - 1991年个人食物摄入量持续调查中的9920名参与者(均由美国农业部开展)制定了饮食、常量营养素和食物组消费的可比测量方法。主要结果是饮食质量指数得分(范围为0至16),该指数是美国国家科学院基于八种食物和营养素的建议综合而成。得分4分及以下被认为表明饮食相对更健康,得分10分及以上则表明饮食相对不太健康。
所有群体的总体饮食质量均有所改善,从1965年平均饮食质量指数得分7.4降至1989 - 1991年的6.4。1965年,社会经济地位低的黑人以及在较小程度上社会经济地位低的白人,饮食比社会经济地位高的白人更好。到1989 - 1991年调查时,种族和社会经济群体之间的差异已缩小。1965年,社会经济地位低的白人中有9.3%、社会经济地位低的黑人中有16.4%以及社会经济地位高的白人中有4.7%的平均得分在4分及以下。在1989 - 1991年调查中,相应的百分比分别为19.9%、23.5%和20.0%。所有群体的脂肪消费量均有所下降。水果和蔬菜的消费量随时间变化不大,中等和高社会经济地位的黑人有所增加除外。谷物和豆类的消费量在中等和高社会经济地位的白人中随时间增加,而在社会经济地位低的黑人中则下降。
1965年,各群体在饮食质量上存在很大差异,以该指数衡量,社会经济地位高的白人饮食最不健康,社会经济地位低的黑人饮食最健康。到1989 - 1991年调查时,所有群体的饮食都有所改善且相对相似。