Ronsmans C, Bulut A, Yolsal N, Agaçfidan A, Filippi V
Maternal and Child Epidemiology Unit, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, UK.
Genitourin Med. 1996 Jun;72(3):182-6. doi: 10.1136/sti.72.3.182.
To test the diagnostic validity of clinical algorithms for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in an urban population of married women in Turkey.
Cross-sectional population-based survey.
A systematic sample of 867 women who reported the use of contraceptive methods.
Sensitivity, specificity and positive predictive value of clinical algorithms for the diagnosis of C trachomatis.
C trachomatis was diagnosed in 4.89% of the women. The WHO algorithm for use in settings where no vaginal examination could be performed had a sensitivity of 9% and a specificity of 96%. The corresponding figures for the WHO algorithm incorporating the findings of a speculum examination were 47% and 56% respectively. Algorithms incorporating symptoms or signs other than those suggested by the WHO did not yield satisfactory standards of validity.
The findings of this study do not support the widespread introduction of the use of clinical decision models for screening of women for chlamydia infection in primary health care settings such as family planning or antenatal clinics. The large number of false positive results with the use of the clinical algorithms tested in this study would cause unnecessary costs to the health system and unnecessary interventions to the women treated.
在土耳其城市已婚女性人群中,测试用于检测沙眼衣原体的临床算法的诊断效度。
基于人群的横断面调查。
对867名报告使用避孕方法的女性进行系统抽样。
诊断沙眼衣原体的临床算法的灵敏度、特异度和阳性预测值。
4.89%的女性被诊断为沙眼衣原体感染。世界卫生组织(WHO)用于无法进行阴道检查情况的算法,灵敏度为9%,特异度为96%。纳入窥器检查结果的WHO算法,相应数字分别为47%和56%。纳入WHO所建议症状或体征以外其他症状或体征的算法,未产生令人满意的效度标准。
本研究结果不支持在计划生育或产前诊所等初级卫生保健机构广泛采用临床决策模型对女性进行衣原体感染筛查。本研究中所测试的临床算法产生大量假阳性结果,会给卫生系统带来不必要的成本,并对接受治疗的女性进行不必要的干预。