Roth J, Schweizer P, Gückel C
Departement Medizinische Radiologie, Universitätskliniken, Kantonsspital, Basel.
Schweiz Med Wochenschr. 1996 Jun 29;126(26):1157-71.
After an introduction, three selected contributions to the 10th Course on Radiation Protection held at the University Hospital of Basel are presented. The principles of radiation protection and new Swiss legislation are discussed as the basis for radiological protection. Ways are proposed of reducing radiation exposure while optimizing the X-ray picture with a minimum dose to patient and personnel. Radiation effects from low doses. From the beginning, life on this planet has been exposed to ionizing radiation from natural sources. For about one century additional irradiation has reached us from man-made sources as well. In Switzerland the overall annual radiation exposure from ambient and man-made sources amounts to about 4 mSv. The terrestrial and cosmic radiation and natural radionuclids in the body cause about 1.17 mSv (29%). As much as 1.6 mSv (40%) results from exposure to radon and its progenies, primarily inside homes. Medical applications contribute approximately 1 mSv (26%) to the annual radiation exposure and releases from atomic weapons, nuclear facilities and miscellaneous industrial operations yield less than 0.12 mSv (< 5%) to the annual dose. Observations of detrimental radiation effects from intermediate to high doses are challenged by observations of biopositive adaptive responses and hormesis following low dose exposure. The important question, whether cellular adaptive response or hormesis could cause beneficial effects to the human organism that would outweigh the detrimental effects attributed to low radiation doses, remains to be resolved. Whether radiation exerts a detrimental, inhibitory, modifying or even beneficial effect is likely to result from identical molecular lesions but to depend upon their quantity, localization and time scale of initiation, as well as the specific responsiveness of the cellular systems involved. For matters of radiation protection the bionegative radiation effects are classified as deterministic effects or stochastic effects respectively. The various histopathological reactions of tissues and organs following localized tissue irradiation, and the radiation syndromes following total body irradiation, constitute the deterministic effects. There will be a threshold below which deterministic effects do not appear and spontaneous incidences are not known. For low dose risk considerations deterministic effects are of no significance. Genetic effects and carcinogenesis are said to be stochastic effects. Characteristically the probability of stochastic effects increases with dose but the severity of the effects is independent of the dose. The shape of the dose-response relationship at intermediate to high dose levels is linear-quadratic. For exposure to low doses the response becomes linear, as is to be expected for a linear-quadratic function at low dose. No threshold is assumed for stochastic effects. The estimate of probability of fatal cancer by the ICRP is 4 x 10(-2) per Sv for the working population and 5 x 10(-2) per Sv for the total population. Their estimate of probability of serious hereditary disorders within the first two generations is 1 x 10(-2) per Sv. The highest probability coefficient is attributed to mental retardation following exposure in utero. Within the sensitive period at 8-15 weeks of gestation, a risk probability of 40 x 10(-2) per Sv is assumed but a threshold at 0.1 Sv is not excluded. Conclusions drawn from experiments, clinical observations and epidemiological studies following intermediate to high radiation exposures attribute a mutagenic and carcinogenic competence to all radiation doses. Microdosimetric considerations support this assumption. This conclusion cannot be confirmed experimentally nor by epidemiological studies of populations living under different conditions from natural sources of radiation. Nevertheless, a change in the present restrictive radiation protection policy does not yet appear appropriate.
引言之后,将介绍在巴塞尔大学医院举办的第10届辐射防护课程上的三篇精选论文。讨论了辐射防护原则和瑞士新立法,作为放射防护的基础。提出了在以最低剂量对患者和工作人员进行X射线成像优化的同时减少辐射暴露的方法。低剂量辐射效应。从一开始,地球上的生命就一直暴露于来自自然源的电离辐射。大约一个世纪以来,我们也受到了来自人造源的额外辐射。在瑞士,来自环境和人造源的年总辐射暴露量约为4毫希沃特。陆地和宇宙辐射以及体内的天然放射性核素导致约1.17毫希沃特(29%)的辐射量。高达1.6毫希沃特(40%)的辐射量来自于氡及其子体的暴露,主要是在室内。医疗应用对年辐射暴露的贡献约为1毫希沃特(26%),而来自核武器、核设施和其他工业活动的释放对年剂量的贡献小于0.12毫希沃特(<5%)。中高剂量有害辐射效应的观察结果受到低剂量暴露后生物阳性适应性反应和兴奋效应观察结果的挑战。细胞适应性反应或兴奋效应是否会对人体产生有益影响,且这种有益影响超过低辐射剂量所带来的有害影响,这一重要问题仍有待解决。辐射是产生有害、抑制、修饰甚至有益的影响,可能是由相同分子损伤引起的,但这取决于损伤的数量、定位、起始的时间尺度以及所涉及细胞系统的特定反应性。就辐射防护而言,生物负面辐射效应分别被归类为确定性效应或随机效应。局部组织照射后组织和器官的各种组织病理学反应以及全身照射后的辐射综合征构成了确定性效应。存在一个阈值,低于该阈值确定性效应不会出现,且自发发生率未知。对于低剂量风险考量,确定性效应没有意义。遗传效应和致癌作用被认为是随机效应。其特点是随机效应的概率随剂量增加,但效应的严重程度与剂量无关。中高剂量水平下剂量 - 反应关系的形状是线性 - 二次的。对于低剂量暴露,反应变为线性,这是低剂量下线性 - 二次函数所预期的。随机效应不假定存在阈值。国际辐射防护委员会(ICRP)对职业人群致命癌症概率的估计是每西弗4×10⁻²,对总人口的估计是每西弗5×10⁻²。他们对前两代内严重遗传疾病概率的估计是每西弗1×10⁻²。最高概率系数归因于子宫内暴露后的智力迟钝。在妊娠8 - 15周的敏感期内,假定每西弗的风险概率为40×10⁻²,但不排除0.1西弗的阈值。从中高辐射暴露后的实验、临床观察和流行病学研究得出的结论认为,所有辐射剂量都具有致突变和致癌能力。微剂量学考量支持这一假设。这一结论既不能通过实验得到证实,也不能通过对生活在与自然辐射源不同条件下人群的流行病学研究得到证实。然而,目前改变严格的辐射防护政策似乎仍不合适。