Discrepancy between brain magnetic fields elicited by pattern and luminance stimulations in the fovea: adequate stimulus positions and a measure of discrepancy.

A conventional equivalent current dipole estimation provides one of the quantitative measures to evaluate the discrepancy between two single-dipole-like magnetic field patterns, though there is one problem; all stimulus positions in the visual field do not necessarily contribute to the generation of a single-dipole-like magnetic field. Another important problem occurs when the field pattern is complex and cannot be approximated by a dipole. This makes it difficult to evaluate the discrepancy between two magnetic field patterns by the dipole parameters. In this paper, we determined the stimulus positions adequate for generating single-dipole-like magnetic field patterns by evaluating the magnetic field's goodness-of-fit to the field generated by a single dipole. We propose to use a similarity (SIM) as a quantitative measure of the discrepancy between two complex magnetic field patterns. The SIM is defined as an angle between two magnetic field vectors. We evaluated the discrepancy between the 100 ms post-stimulus responses to pattern-reversal (Rv) stimulus, pattern-onset (Pat) stimulus, and luminance-onset (Lumi) stimulus. The following results were obtained: (1) Stimulation of some of the octants in the fovea, far from the vertical meridian, elicited a single-dipole-like magnetic field pattern at a latency of 100 ms, though stimulation of the central part of the fovea, and stimulation of the octants along the vertical meridian, did not elicit a single-dipole-like magnetic field pattern; (2) The discrepancy between responses was quantitatively evaluated by the SIM even if the field patterns were complex; (3) The SIM analysis showed that the discrepancy between the responses to the Rv and the Lumi stimuli, as well as that between the responses to the Pat and the Lumi stimuli, were greater than that between the responses to the Rv and the Pat stimuli.