Sapoval M R, Turmel-Rodrigues L A, Raynaud A C, Bourquelot P, Rodrigue H, Gaux J C
Department of Cardiovascular Radiology, Hôspital Broussais, Paris, France.
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 1996 May-Jun;7(3):335-42. doi: 10.1016/s1051-0443(96)72863-4.
To report midterm follow-up after implantation of covered stents for hemodialysis access.
Over a 2-year period, a Cragg Endopro stent was placed in 14 patients (mean age, 66.6 years +/- 15) to treat angioplasty-induced ruptures (n = 3), pseudoaneurysm (n = 1), postangioplasty residual stenosis (n = 2), and early restenosis (n = 8, four of them in a Wallstent).
Initial placement was successful in all cases. A clinical inflammatory reaction was observed in all three cases of placement in the forearm. When the covered stent was placed in a stenotic vessel, restenosis always occurred within 6 months. Primary and secondary patencies were 28.5% +/- 13.9 and 67.8% +/- 14.5, respectively, at 6 months. Covered stents were of undoubtable benefit in one case of rupture after Wallstent failure and in one case of restenosis in a Wallstent.
Covered Cragg stents are effective in controlling angioplasty- induced rupture and sometimes for maintaining patency after restenosis in a Wallstent. They do not prevent restenosis and are responsible for an inflammatory reaction of unknown origin and long-term effect.
报告覆膜支架植入治疗血液透析通路的中期随访结果。
在2年期间,14例患者(平均年龄66.6岁±15岁)植入了Cragg Endopro支架,以治疗血管成形术引起的破裂(n = 3)、假性动脉瘤(n = 1)、血管成形术后残余狭窄(n = 2)和早期再狭窄(n = 8,其中4例植入Wallstent支架)。
所有病例初始植入均成功。在前臂植入的3例患者中均观察到临床炎症反应。当覆膜支架植入狭窄血管时,再狭窄总是在6个月内发生。6个月时,一期通畅率和二期通畅率分别为28.5%±13.9和67.8%±14.5。在1例Wallstent支架失败后的破裂病例和1例Wallstent支架再狭窄病例中,覆膜支架有明显益处。
覆膜Cragg支架在控制血管成形术引起的破裂方面有效,有时对维持Wallstent支架再狭窄后的通畅也有效。它们不能预防再狭窄,且会引起不明原因的炎症反应和长期影响。