Mowery D C, Mitchell V
University of California, Berkeley, USA.
J Health Polit Policy Law. 1995 Winter;20(4):973-1000. doi: 10.1215/03616878-20-4-973.
Since taking office, President Clinton has devoted considerable attention to childhood immunization and to the overall U.S. policy toward vaccine development, delivery, and pricing. But the reliability of U.S. vaccine supplies has received far less attention, despite several recent interruptions in vaccine production and supply. Moreover, the increasing producer concentration in the U.S. and global vaccine industries raises the possibility that more and more important vaccines will be produced by a single firm, often in a single production facility. Is a federal policy for vaccine supply assurance necessary, and what form should it take? Are sole-source suppliers a weak link in the U.S. vaccine supply chain? Are the recommendations of the Institute of Medicine's Committee on Emerging Infections for a publicly owned "standby production capacity" of critical vaccines feasible or cost-effective? We consider these and other issues in our discussion of the U.S. vaccine industry, the potential role of foreign vaccine suppliers, and the use of existing federal facilities and policies to address a possible interruption in critical vaccine supplies.
自上任以来,克林顿总统对儿童免疫接种以及美国在疫苗研发、配送和定价方面的总体政策给予了相当多的关注。然而,尽管近期疫苗生产和供应出现了几次中断,但美国疫苗供应的可靠性却很少受到关注。此外,美国和全球疫苗行业的生产商集中度不断提高,这增加了越来越多重要疫苗由单一公司生产的可能性,而且通常是在单一生产设施中生产。是否需要一项联邦疫苗供应保障政策,以及该政策应采取何种形式?单一来源供应商是否是美国疫苗供应链中的薄弱环节?医学研究所新兴感染委员会关于关键疫苗的公有“备用生产能力”的建议是否可行或具有成本效益?在讨论美国疫苗行业、外国疫苗供应商的潜在作用以及利用现有的联邦设施和政策来应对关键疫苗供应可能出现的中断时,我们将考虑这些及其他问题。