Suppr超能文献

经直肠和经尿道超声检查对前列腺体积和尺寸的比较。

Comparison of prostatic volume and dimensions by transrectal and transurethral ultrasonography.

作者信息

Nathan M S, Mei Q, Seenivasagam K, Davies B, Wickham J E, Miller R A

机构信息

Department of Minimally Invasive Therapy, United Medical and Dental School of Guy's, London, UK.

出版信息

Br J Urol. 1996 Jul;78(1):84-9. doi: 10.1046/j.1464-410x.1996.05416.x.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the volumes and dimensions of the prostate gland as measured by transrectal and transurethral ultrasonography (TRUS and TUUS) and to study the prostatic changes that occur in the presence of an urethral instrument.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Twenty men (mean age 71 years, range 43-85) with symptoms of prostatic enlargement underwent TRUS and the dimensions and volumes of their prostates were obtained by the dimensional method and by step planimetry. Within 24 h, all the men were examined cystoscopically under sedoanalgesia and underwent TUUS. Their prostatic volumes and dimensions were again measured by the dimensional method and by step planimetry. Step planimetry was carried out using a specially designed indexer firmly attached to the examination couch or operating table. All the static images and planimetry slices were video recorded for later computer enhancement and to study the three-dimensional changes occurring in the prostate. The volumes and dimensions obtained by TRUS and TUUS were compared.

RESULTS

Volumes obtained by transurethral step planimetry were 22% greater than those from transrectal planimetry. Although there was a good correlation (r = 0.984) between transurethral planimetry and the volumes derived using the transurethral dimensions with the prolate ellipsoid formula, the latter produced values 17% and 25% lower by the transurethral and transrectal routes, respectively. These volume estimates varied widely, indicating that the simple addition of a constant to the prolate ellipsoid formula would not correct the volume. Three-dimensional changes of the prostate occurred with TRUS and TUUS: with TUUS, the craniocaudal and anteroposterior diameters were significantly larger (by 7% and 18%, respectively) while the transverse diameter was smaller by 20%.

CONCLUSION

The estimated volumes and dimensions of the prostate differed when measured by TRUS and TUUS and three-dimensional changes in the prostate occurred in the presence of an urethral instrument.

摘要

目的

比较经直肠超声检查(TRUS)和经尿道超声检查(TUUS)所测量的前列腺体积和尺寸,并研究在使用尿道器械时前列腺发生的变化。

患者与方法

20名有前列腺增生症状的男性(平均年龄71岁,范围43 - 85岁)接受了TRUS检查,通过尺寸测量法和逐步面积测量法获取其前列腺的尺寸和体积。在24小时内,所有男性在镇静镇痛下接受膀胱镜检查并进行TUUS检查。再次通过尺寸测量法和逐步面积测量法测量他们的前列腺体积和尺寸。逐步面积测量使用牢固连接在检查床或手术台上的特殊设计的分度器进行。所有静态图像和面积测量切片都进行了视频记录,以便后续进行计算机增强处理,并研究前列腺发生的三维变化。比较TRUS和TUUS所获得的体积和尺寸。

结果

经尿道逐步面积测量法获得的体积比经直肠面积测量法获得的体积大22%。尽管经尿道面积测量法与使用经尿道尺寸通过长椭球体公式得出的体积之间存在良好的相关性(r = 0.984),但后者经尿道和经直肠途径得出的值分别低17%和25%。这些体积估计值差异很大,表明在长椭球体公式中简单加上一个常数并不能校正体积。TRUS和TUUS检查时前列腺会发生三维变化:在TUUS检查时,上下径和前后径显著增大(分别增大7%和18%),而横径减小20%。

结论

TRUS和TUUS测量时前列腺的估计体积和尺寸不同,并且在使用尿道器械时前列腺会发生三维变化。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验