Suppr超能文献

立体定向芯针活检在乳腺良恶性病变诊断中的组织学准确性

Histological precision of stereotactic core biopsy in diagnosis of malignant and premalignant breast lesions.

作者信息

Dahlstrom J E, Sutton S, Jain S

机构信息

Department of Anatomical Pathology, Woden Valley Hospital, Canberra, Australia.

出版信息

Histopathology. 1996 Jun;28(6):537-41. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2559.1996.d01-463.x.

Abstract

The reliability of stereotactic core biopsy in the diagnosis of malignant and premalignant breast lesions was assessed in comparison to excision biopsy in patients with non-palpable suspicious breast lesions detected in a mammography breast screening programme. Fifty-two cases of malignancy and nine of atypical ductal hyperplasia were diagnosed on the programme during the two year period July 1993 to June 1995; two patients did not have excision biopsy. Stereotactic core biopsies and representative sections from 59 excision specimens from the same patients were assessed "blind' by one pathologist. All 51 cancers diagnosed on stereotactic core biopsy were confirmed to be malignant on excision biopsy. There was 96% concordance between stereotactic core biopsy and excision biopsy for the diagnosis of invasive or in situ cancer, and 78% concordance for the type of cancer. The stereotactic core biopsy and excision biopsy diagnoses were: invasive ductal carcinomas (39 on stereotactic core biopsy vs. 33 on excision biopsy), mucinous carcinomas (1 vs. 2), invasive lobular carcinomas (3 vs, 8), and in situ carcinomas (8 vs. 8), two of which had invasive cancer present only in the stereotactic core biopsy. Of the nine cases of atypical ductal hyperplasia diagnosed on stereotactic core biopsy, eight had an excision biopsy, six showed low nuclear grade in situ or invasive cancer, one had a 3 mm focus of high grade invasive ductal cancer and one was atypical ductal hyperplasia. In the invasive ductal carcinoma group stereotactic core biopsy underestimated tumour grade: In nine cases (31%) the cancer at excision was of a higher grade. Stereotactic core biopsy is a reliable alternative to excision biopsy in the diagnosis of breast cancer, however, stereotactic core biopsy may underestimate tumour grade in invasive ductal carcinoma and may not differentiate between invasive ductal carcinoma and lobular carcinoma. It is recommended that the diagnosis of atypical ductal hyperplasia on stereotactic core biopsy be followed by excision biopsy, as stereotactic core biopsy underestimates the presence of cancer in this group.

摘要

在一项乳腺钼靶筛查项目中,对触诊不到的可疑乳腺病变患者,将立体定向核心活检与切除活检进行比较,评估立体定向核心活检在诊断恶性和癌前乳腺病变中的可靠性。在1993年7月至1995年6月的两年期间,该项目诊断出52例恶性肿瘤和9例非典型导管增生;2例患者未进行切除活检。由一名病理学家对来自同一患者的59个切除标本的立体定向核心活检和代表性切片进行“盲法”评估。在立体定向核心活检中诊断出的所有51例癌症在切除活检中均被确认为恶性。立体定向核心活检与切除活检在诊断浸润性或原位癌方面的一致性为96%,在癌症类型方面的一致性为78%。立体定向核心活检和切除活检的诊断结果如下:浸润性导管癌(立体定向核心活检诊断39例,切除活检诊断33例)、黏液癌(1例对2例)、浸润性小叶癌(3例对8例)和原位癌(8例对8例),其中2例仅在立体定向核心活检中存在浸润性癌。在立体定向核心活检诊断出的9例非典型导管增生病例中,8例进行了切除活检,6例显示低核级原位或浸润性癌,1例有3毫米的高级别浸润性导管癌灶,1例为非典型导管增生。在浸润性导管癌组中,立体定向核心活检低估了肿瘤分级:9例(31%)切除时的癌症分级更高。立体定向核心活检是乳腺癌诊断中切除活检的可靠替代方法,然而,立体定向核心活检可能低估浸润性导管癌的肿瘤分级,并且可能无法区分浸润性导管癌和小叶癌。建议在立体定向核心活检诊断为非典型导管增生后进行切除活检,因为立体定向核心活检低估了该组中癌症的存在。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验