Heller M A, Calcaterra J A, Tyler L A, Burson L L
Department of Psychology, Winston-Salem State University, NC 27110, USA.
Perception. 1996;25(3):321-34. doi: 10.1068/p250321.
In three experiments the production and interpretation of perspective drawings by blind and sighted subjects were examined. Blindfolded sighted, early-blind, and late-blind subjects first attempted to produce raised-line drawings of a surface at a number of angles-0 degree (panel horizontal), -22.5 degrees, -45 degrees, -67.5 degrees, and -90 degrees (vertical). Congenitally blind subjects did not show foreshortening in their naive raised-line drawings. However, the congenitally blind subjects were able to understand aspects of perspective, and performed as well as the blindfolded sighted and late-blind subjects in a subsequent multiple-choice task. Subjects in the multiple-choice task were required to match tangible perspective drawings to a slanted board. Although the three groups performed alike, both groups of blind subjects performed better than blindfolded sighted controls on judgments involving drawings of the vertical panel in the second experiment. In a final experiment, in which vision and touch were compared, sighted subjects were required to adjust the angle of the panel to match foreshortened, perspective drawings. This experiment yielded significantly better performance with vision than with touch, but only for drawings of the board at the vertical orientation. The results suggested that congenitally blind people may benefit from haptic exposure to raised-line configurations representing geometric perspective.
在三项实验中,研究了盲人和有视力的受试者对透视图的绘制和理解。蒙眼的有视力者、早期失明者和晚期失明者首先尝试以多个角度(0度(面板水平)、-22.5度、-45度、-67.5度和-90度(垂直))绘制一个表面的凸线图。先天性盲人在其原始的凸线图中没有表现出透视缩短。然而,先天性盲人能够理解透视的各个方面,并且在随后的多项选择任务中的表现与蒙眼的有视力者和晚期失明者一样好。多项选择任务中的受试者被要求将有形的透视图与倾斜的板子相匹配。尽管三组表现相似,但在第二个实验中,两组盲人受试者在涉及垂直面板绘图的判断上比蒙眼的有视力对照组表现更好。在最后一个比较视觉和触觉的实验中,有视力的受试者被要求调整面板的角度以匹配透视缩短的透视图。该实验显示,视觉条件下的表现明显优于触觉条件下的表现,但仅适用于垂直方向板子的绘图。结果表明,先天性盲人可能会从对代表几何透视的凸线构型的触觉接触中受益。