Balch C M, Soong S J, Bartolucci A A, Urist M M, Karakousis C P, Smith T J, Temple W J, Ross M I, Jewell W R, Mihm M C, Barnhill R L, Wanebo H J
University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA.
Ann Surg. 1996 Sep;224(3):255-63; discussion 263-6. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199609000-00002.
A prospective multi-institutional randomized surgical trial involving 740 stage I and II melanoma patients was conducted by the Intergroup Melanoma Surgical Program to determine whether elective (immediate) lymph node dissection (ELND) for intermediate-thickness melanoma (1-4 mm) improves survival rates compared with clinical observation of the lymph nodes. A second objective was to define subgroups of melanoma patients who would have a higher survival with ELND.
The eligible patients were stratified according to tumor thickness, anatomic site, and ulceration, and then were prerandomized to either ELND or nodal observation. Femoral, axillary, or modified neck dissections were performed using standardized surgical guidelines.
The median follow-up was 7.4 years. A multifactorial (Cox regression) analysis showed that the following factors independently influenced survival: tumor ulceration, trunk site, tumor thickness, and patient age. Surgical treatment results were first compared based on randomized intent. Overall 5-year survival was not significantly different for patients who received ELND or nodal observation. However, the 552 patients 60 years of age or younger (75% of total group) with ELND has a significantly better 5-year survival. Among these patients, 5-year survival was better with ELND versus nodal observation for the 335 patients with tumors 1 to 2 mm thick, the 403 patients without tumor ulceration, and the 284 patients with tumors 1 to 2 mm thick and no ulceration. In contrast, patients older than 60 years of age who had ELND actually had a lower survival trend than those who had nodal observation. When survival rates were compared based on treatment actually received (i.e., including crossover patients), the patients with significantly improved 5-year survival rates after ELND included those with tumors 1 to 2 mm thick, those without tumor ulceration, and those 60 years of age or younger with tumors 1 to 2 mm thick or without ulceration.
This is the first randomized study to prove the value of surgical treatment for clinically occult regional metastases. Patients 60 years or age or younger with intermediate-thickness melanomas, especially with nonulcerative melanoma and those with tumors 1 to 2 mm thick, may benefit from ELND. However, because some patients still are developing distant disease, these results should be considered an interim analysis.
黑色素瘤外科协作组开展了一项前瞻性多机构随机外科试验,纳入740例I期和II期黑色素瘤患者,以确定对于中等厚度(1 - 4毫米)黑色素瘤,选择性(即刻)淋巴结清扫术(ELND)与淋巴结临床观察相比是否能提高生存率。第二个目的是确定接受ELND能有更高生存率的黑色素瘤患者亚组。
符合条件的患者根据肿瘤厚度、解剖部位和溃疡情况进行分层,然后预先随机分为ELND组或淋巴结观察组。采用标准化手术指南进行股部、腋窝或改良颈部清扫术。
中位随访时间为7.4年。多因素(Cox回归)分析显示,以下因素独立影响生存率:肿瘤溃疡、躯干部位、肿瘤厚度和患者年龄。首先根据随机意向比较手术治疗结果。接受ELND或淋巴结观察组患者的总体5年生存率无显著差异。然而,552例60岁及以下(占总组75%)接受ELND的患者5年生存率显著更好。在这些患者中,对于335例肿瘤厚度为1至2毫米的患者、403例无肿瘤溃疡的患者以及284例肿瘤厚度为1至2毫米且无溃疡的患者,ELND组的5年生存率优于淋巴结观察组。相比之下,60岁以上接受ELND的患者实际生存趋势低于接受淋巴结观察组的患者。当根据实际接受的治疗(即包括交叉患者)比较生存率时,ELND后5年生存率显著提高的患者包括肿瘤厚度为1至2毫米的患者、无肿瘤溃疡的患者以及60岁及以下肿瘤厚度为1至2毫米或无溃疡的患者。
这是第一项证明手术治疗对临床隐匿性区域转移价值的随机研究。60岁及以下的中等厚度黑色素瘤患者,尤其是无溃疡黑色素瘤患者以及肿瘤厚度为1至2毫米患者,可能从ELND中获益。然而,由于一些患者仍会发生远处疾病,这些结果应视为中期分析。