Suppr超能文献

椭圆窗和圆窗之间的压力差是对耳蜗有效的声学刺激吗?

Is the pressure difference between the oval and round windows the effective acoustic stimulus for the cochlea?

作者信息

Voss S E, Rosowski J J, Peake W T

机构信息

Eaton-Peabody Laboratory of Auditory Physiology, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Boston 02114, USA.

出版信息

J Acoust Soc Am. 1996 Sep;100(3):1602-16. doi: 10.1121/1.416062.

Abstract

The assumption that the pressure difference between the cochlear windows is the stimulus that produces cochlear responses is tested experimentally in the ears of anesthetized cats. Cochlear potential is used as a measure of cochlear response. The sound pressures at the oval and round windows are individually controlled with both pressures at the same frequency and amplitude. When the angle difference between the two pressures is varied over one cycle, cochlear-potential magnitude varies by about 40 dB, with a sharp minimum occurring with the angle difference near zero. A linear model of the response to the two input pressures estimates a complex common-mode gain C and a complex difference-mode gain D; magnitude of D is about 35 dB greater than magnitude of C over the frequency range that was tested (75 to 1000 Hz). Thus, except for conditions that make the common-mode input much larger than the difference-mode input, the pressure difference between the oval and round windows is, to a good approximation, the effective acoustic stimulus for the cochlea.

摘要

关于耳蜗窗之间的压力差是产生耳蜗反应的刺激这一假设,在麻醉猫的耳朵上进行了实验测试。耳蜗电位被用作耳蜗反应的一种测量指标。椭圆窗和圆窗处的声压分别进行控制,且两种压力具有相同的频率和幅度。当两种压力之间的相位差在一个周期内变化时,耳蜗电位幅值变化约40分贝,在相位差接近零时会出现一个明显的最小值。对两个输入压力响应的线性模型估计出一个复共模增益C和一个复差模增益D;在所测试的频率范围(75至1000赫兹)内,D的幅值比C的幅值大约大35分贝。因此,除了使共模输入远大于差模输入的情况外,椭圆窗和圆窗之间的压力差在很大程度上可近似为耳蜗的有效声刺激。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验