Suppr超能文献

醋氯芬酸治疗强直性脊柱炎患者的疗效和耐受性:一项多中心对照临床试验。醋氯芬酸吲哚美辛研究组。

The efficacy and tolerability of aceclofenac in the treatment of patients with ankylosing spondylitis: a multicenter controlled clinical trial. Aceclofenac Indomethacin Study Group.

作者信息

Batlle-Gualda E, Figueroa M, Ivorra J, Raber A

机构信息

Division of Rheumatology, Hospital General Universitario de Alicante, San Sebastián, Guipúzcoa, Spain.

出版信息

J Rheumatol. 1996 Jul;23(7):1200-6.

PMID:8823693
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of aceclofenac, a new nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug, in patients with active ankylosing spondylitis (AS).

METHODS

310 outpatients with active AS were enrolled in a 3 month, multicenter, parallel, double blind trial and were randomly assigned to receive aceclofenac (200 mg daily) or indomethacin (100 mg daily). They were evaluated after a washout period of 7 days, at baseline, 15, 30, 60, and 90 days.

RESULTS

No significant differences were found between aceclofenac and indomethacin in the number of withdrawals due to lack of efficacy or adverse events. A repeated measures analysis (ANOVA) of patients who completed the trial showed no significant differences between either treatment. Within-group comparisons in an intention-to-treat analysis showed improvement (p < 0.05) in all the primary efficacy variables: pain visual analog scale (VAS) (37 vs 41%), morning stiffness (51 vs 46%), modified Schober's test (21 vs 16%), C7-iliac crest line distraction (11 vs 14%), lateral spinal flexion (6 vs 10%), in aceclofenac and indomethacin treated patients, respectively. Other variables including chest expansion, occiput-to-wall, Likert pain score, use of analgesic rescue, and patient and physician global assessment, also showed significant improvement from baseline values. No significant differences between treatments were noted for any efficacy variable. Good to excellent improvement in pain (52 vs 64%) and morning stiffness (70 vs 68%) was observed in aceclofenac and indomethacin treated patients, respectively. Patients taking aceclofenac had significantly fewer central nervous system related adverse events than patients treated with indomethacin (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Aceclofenac and indomethacin did not differ with respect to efficacy in the treatment of active AS, although aceclofenac was slightly better tolerated.

摘要

目的

评估新型非甾体抗炎药醋氯芬酸治疗活动性强直性脊柱炎(AS)患者的疗效和耐受性。

方法

310例活动性AS门诊患者参加了一项为期3个月的多中心、平行、双盲试验,随机分配接受醋氯芬酸(每日200mg)或吲哚美辛(每日100mg)治疗。在7天的洗脱期后、基线期、第15、30、60和90天对他们进行评估。

结果

在因疗效不佳或不良事件导致的退出人数方面,醋氯芬酸和吲哚美辛之间未发现显著差异。对完成试验的患者进行的重复测量分析(方差分析)显示,两种治疗方法之间无显著差异。意向性治疗分析中的组内比较显示,所有主要疗效变量均有改善(p<0.05):醋氯芬酸和吲哚美辛治疗的患者疼痛视觉模拟量表(VAS)分别改善(37%对41%)、晨僵(51%对46%)、改良Schober试验(21%对16%)、C7-髂嵴线牵张(11%对14%)、脊柱侧屈(6%对10%)。其他变量包括胸廓活动度、枕墙距、Likert疼痛评分、急救镇痛药的使用以及患者和医生的整体评估,也均较基线值有显著改善。在任何疗效变量方面,两种治疗方法之间均未发现显著差异。醋氯芬酸和吲哚美辛治疗的患者分别有52%和64%的疼痛得到良好至极佳改善,70%和68%的晨僵得到改善。服用醋氯芬酸的患者中枢神经系统相关不良事件明显少于服用吲哚美辛的患者(p<0.001)。

结论

在治疗活动性AS方面,醋氯芬酸和吲哚美辛的疗效无差异,尽管醋氯芬酸的耐受性稍好。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验