Smulian J C, Vintzileos A M, Rodis J F, Campbell W A
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, USA.
J Clin Ultrasound. 1996 Mar-Apr;24(3):123-7. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0096(199603)24:3<123::AID-JCU3>3.0.CO;2-J.
The objective of this study was to determine the degree of documented compliance of community-based ultrasound reports with suggested standards/guidelines for basic ultrasound examinations as published by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) and the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine (AIUM). First trimester reports from obstetric offices (n = 20) had complete compliance with ACOG guidelines in 35% and AIUM standards in 15% of the cases (p = NS). Radiological reports (n = 26) had complete compliance with ACOG guidelines in 11.5% and AIUM standards in 3.9% of the cases (p = NS). None of the second/third trimester reports from either the obstetrical offices (n = 35) or from radiological facilities (n = 94) had complete compliance with either ACOG or AIUM standards/guidelines. Ultrasound reports generated by community-based obstetricians and radiologists from our referral sources demonstrate significant omissions in documentation of components suggested by AIUM and ACOG for minimum standards of basic ultrasound examinations.
本研究的目的是确定社区超声报告符合美国妇产科医师学会(ACOG)和美国医学超声学会(AIUM)发布的基本超声检查建议标准/指南的记录程度。产科办公室的早孕期报告(n = 20)中,35%完全符合ACOG指南,15%完全符合AIUM标准(p =无统计学意义)。放射学报告(n = 26)中,11.5%完全符合ACOG指南,3.9%完全符合AIUM标准(p =无统计学意义)。产科办公室(n = 35)或放射学机构(n = 94)的中/晚期报告均无完全符合ACOG或AIUM标准/指南的情况。我们转诊来源的社区产科医生和放射科医生生成的超声报告显示,在记录AIUM和ACOG建议的基本超声检查最低标准的组成部分方面存在重大遗漏。