Brockhoff G, Endl E, Minuth W, Hofstädter F, Knüchel R
Institute of Pathology, University of Regensburg, Germany.
Anal Cell Pathol. 1996 Jun;11(1):55-70.
Flow cytometric multi-parameter analysis has proven to be a powerful tool to characterize subpopulations of cell suspensions, and is applied routinely in hematology. However, in studies of cancer where there is interest in defining phenotypic markers in conjunction with DNA content, this method has hardly been applied [6]. Our objective was to develop a methodology that extends previous investigations on relative and absolute quantitation of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) in dual parameter analysis in vitro on human bladder cancer cell lines [3]. In order to quantitate EGFR content in tumours and to relate it to DNA content, tumour selection, DNA-content, and EGFR-content measurements should be carried out simultaneously. Different fluorescent dyes were used to optimize DNA assessment and antibody staining, using a single laser instrument as a practical approach for clinical routine. In vitro cultures were used to validate the quality of tumour cell selection and antigen quantitation. Therefore, two urothelial tumour cell lines-lowly and highly differentiated-were incubated under different conditions: monolayer (ML), three-dimensional multi-cellular spheroids (MCS) and cocultures (COCU) with the fibroblast cell line NI were investigated and EGFR quantitation was related to S-phase fraction (SPF). Accurate determination of instrument settings allows simultaneous three-colour analysis with DNA assessment. Tumor cell selection based on staining with phycoerythrine (R-PE) against a highly expressed urothelial glycoprotein, detected with the antibody Uro5 or against cytokeratin appeared to be possible in FL2, using the fluorochrome combination fluorescein-isothiocyanate (FITC), R-PE and propidiumiodide (PI). Using this staining protocol, relative and absolute EGFR quantitation (quantum simply cellular beads) is shown to be accurate, when FITC is used for EGFR staining and measured in the green fluorescence channel (FL1). Using this colour combination EGFR content and SPF of tumour cells were compared in different growth states, and could be monitored reliably. In spite of a higher emission spectrum of 7-aminoactinomycin-D (7-AAD), this DNA stain provided no advantage over PI. Broad coefficients of variation (CV) were found when intact cells were stained, thus hindering accurate assessment of ploidy and S-phase fraction. Similarly, Syto-13, a DNA dye detected in FL1, could not be optimized for multi-parameter measurements. Although the emission maximum is at 520 nm, the spectrum is too wide to compensate fluorescence overlap in FL2 or FL3. Quantum Red (QR), used as a streptavidin conjugate in FL3, could not be combined with two other colours for DNA staining, since sufficient compensation was not obtainable when an argon ion laser is used. The coculture model allows verification of tumour cell selection and discrimination. The high differentiated tumour cell line RT4 shows an unambiguous correlation between EGFR content and S-phase fraction. The low differentiated tumour cell line J82 presents a similar pattern of post-transcriptional EGFR regulation with respect to culture condition, however, the S-phase fraction is basically unaffected.
流式细胞术多参数分析已被证明是表征细胞悬液亚群的有力工具,并在血液学中常规应用。然而,在癌症研究中,当人们希望结合DNA含量来定义表型标记时,这种方法几乎未被应用[6]。我们的目标是开发一种方法,扩展先前关于体外人膀胱癌细胞系双参数分析中表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)相对和绝对定量的研究[3]。为了定量肿瘤中的EGFR含量并将其与DNA含量相关联,肿瘤选择、DNA含量和EGFR含量测量应同时进行。使用不同的荧光染料来优化DNA评估和抗体染色,使用单激光仪器作为临床常规的实用方法。体外培养用于验证肿瘤细胞选择和抗原定量的质量。因此,将两种尿路上皮肿瘤细胞系——低分化和高分化——在不同条件下培养:单层(ML)、三维多细胞球体(MCS)以及与成纤维细胞系NI的共培养(COCU),并研究EGFR定量与S期分数(SPF)的关系。准确确定仪器设置可实现与DNA评估的同时三色分析。基于用抗高表达尿路上皮糖蛋白的藻红蛋白(R-PE)染色进行肿瘤细胞选择,使用抗体Uro5检测或抗细胞角蛋白,似乎可以在FL2中进行,使用荧光素异硫氰酸酯(FITC)、R-PE和碘化丙啶(PI)的荧光染料组合。使用这种染色方案时,当FITC用于EGFR染色并在绿色荧光通道(FL1)中测量时,相对和绝对EGFR定量(量子单细胞珠)显示是准确的。使用这种颜色组合,比较了不同生长状态下肿瘤细胞的EGFR含量和SPF,并且可以可靠地进行监测。尽管7-氨基放线菌素-D(7-AAD)的发射光谱较高,但这种DNA染色剂相对于PI没有优势。当完整细胞染色时发现宽泛的变异系数(CV),从而阻碍了对倍性和S期分数的准确评估。同样,在FL1中检测到的DNA染料Syto-13不能针对多参数测量进行优化。尽管发射最大值在520nm,但光谱太宽,无法补偿FL2或FL3中的荧光重叠。在FL3中用作链霉亲和素缀合物的量子红(QR)不能与另外两种颜色用于DNA染色,因为使用氩离子激光时无法获得足够的补偿。共培养模型允许验证肿瘤细胞选择和区分。高分化肿瘤细胞系RT4显示出EGFR含量与S期分数之间明确的相关性。低分化肿瘤细胞系J82在转录后EGFR调节方面呈现出与培养条件相似的模式,然而,S期分数基本不受影响。