Jacobitz S, McLaughlin M M, Livi G P, Burman M, Torphy T J
Department of Pharmacology, Smithkline Beecham Pharmaceuticals, King of Prussia, Pennsylvania 19406, USA.
Mol Pharmacol. 1996 Oct;50(4):891-9.
To identify functional domains of the 886-amino acid human recombinant cAMP-specific phosphodiesterase (PDE) subtype A (rhPDE4A), we engineered the expression of seven mutant proteins containing both NH2- and COOH-terminal truncations. The level of rhPDE4A protein expression in yeast was monitored by immunoblotting using enzyme-specific antisera. Biochemical profiles of the mutant proteins were compared with those of the full-length protein or a fully active truncated form of the enzyme (rhPDE4A Met265-886), lacking the first 264 amino acids. The smallest catalytically active fragment generated was Met332-722, which at 45 kDa is less than half the mass of the full-length enzyme (approximately 110 kDa) but spans the most highly conserved region of the PDE superfamily. Two prototypical PDE4 inhibitors, rolipram and RP 73401, inhibited cAMP hydrolyzing activity of all truncated forms of the enzyme, with IC50 values of 70-2000 nM and 0.2-0.6 nM, respectively. 3H-Rolipram bound to two sites on Met265-886, a high affinity site (Kd1 = 0.7 +/- 0.3 nM) and a low affinity site (Kd2 = 34 +/- 10 nM). Interestingly, 3H-rolipram failed to bind to Met332-886 with high affinity, indicating that high affinity binding is not required for inhibition of enzyme activity. Low affinity rolipram binding was still present in Met332-886 (Kd = 101 +/- 7 nM). In contrast to 3H-rolipram, [3H]RP 73401 bound to a single class of high affinity sites on Met265-886 (Kd = 0.4 +/- 0.1 nM). Further truncation of the enzyme to Met332-886 had no effect on [3H]RP 73401 binding (Kd = 0.2 +/- 0.03 nM). We conclude that the catalytic center of rhPDE4A lies between amino acids 332 and 722. Furthermore, amino acids 265-332 may form a high affinity binding site for rolipram that is outside of the catalytic domain. As a more likely alternative, these amino acids may not form a distinct binding site but instead may be required for the recombinant enzyme to assume a conformation that binds rolipram at the catalytic domain with a high affinity.
为鉴定含886个氨基酸的人重组环磷酸腺苷(cAMP)特异性磷酸二酯酶(PDE)A亚型(rhPDE4A)的功能结构域,我们构建了7种同时包含氨基端和羧基端截短的突变蛋白的表达载体。利用酶特异性抗血清通过免疫印迹法监测酵母中rhPDE4A蛋白的表达水平。将突变蛋白的生化特性与全长蛋白或该酶的一种完全活性截短形式(rhPDE4A Met265 - 886,缺少前264个氨基酸)的生化特性进行比较。产生的最小催化活性片段是Met332 - 722,其分子量为45 kDa,不到全长酶(约110 kDa)的一半,但跨越了PDE超家族中最保守的区域。两种典型的PDE4抑制剂咯利普兰和RP 73401抑制该酶所有截短形式的cAMP水解活性,IC50值分别为70 - 2000 nM和0.2 - 0.6 nM。3H-咯利普兰与Met265 - 886上的两个位点结合,一个高亲和力位点(Kd1 = 0.7 ± 0.3 nM)和一个低亲和力位点(Kd2 = 34 ± 10 nM)。有趣的是,3H-咯利普兰不能与Met332 - 886高亲和力结合,这表明抑制酶活性并不需要高亲和力结合。Met332 - 886中仍存在低亲和力的咯利普兰结合(Kd = 101 ± 7 nM)。与3H-咯利普兰不同,[3H]RP 73401与Met265 - 886上的一类高亲和力位点结合(Kd = 0.4 ± 0.1 nM)。将该酶进一步截短至Met332 - 886对[3H]RP 73401的结合没有影响(Kd = 0.2 ± 0.03 nM)。我们得出结论,rhPDE4A的催化中心位于氨基酸332和722之间。此外,氨基酸265 - 332可能形成咯利普兰的一个高亲和力结合位点,该位点在催化结构域之外。更有可能的另一种情况是,这些氨基酸可能不形成一个独特的结合位点,而是重组酶呈现一种能在催化结构域以高亲和力结合咯利普兰的构象所必需的。