Maigne J Y, Aivaliklis A, Pfefer F
Department of Rehabilitation and Orthopedic Medicine, Hotel-Dieu University Hospital, Paris, France.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1996 Aug 15;21(16):1889-92. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199608150-00012.
This prospective study consisted of the evaluation of a double sacroiliac block in patients with low back pain.
To determine the prevalence of sacroiliac pain in a selected population of patients suffering from low back pain, and to assess certain pain provocation tests.
Previous studies have implicated the sacroliac joint as a potential etiology of back and leg pain, but none has tested double anesthetic blocks in a prospective fashion.
Fifty-four patients with unilateral low back pain, pain mapping compatible with a sacroiliac origin, tenderness over the sacroiliac joint, and no obvious source of pain in the lumbar spine were selected for a double anesthetic block. The procedure consisted of a through clinical examination with a visual analog scale, testing of sacroiliac pain provocation tests followed by a first screening block with a short-acting anesthetic. A second examination consisting of the same tests assessed the efficacy of the first block. If results were positive, a confirmatory block was performed. All blocks were performed under fluoroscopic guidance.
Nineteen patients had a positive response to the first block. Among them, 10 (18.5%) were temporarily relieved by the confirmatory block. No pain provocation test reached statistical significance.
The present study suggests the sacroiliac joint is an uncommon but real source of low back pain. The accuracy of some of the presumed "sacroiliac pain provocations tests" is questioned.
这项前瞻性研究包括对下腰痛患者进行双侧骶髂关节阻滞评估。
确定特定下腰痛患者群体中骶髂关节疼痛的患病率,并评估某些疼痛激发试验。
先前的研究认为骶髂关节是腰腿痛的潜在病因,但尚无研究以前瞻性方式测试双侧麻醉阻滞。
选择54例单侧下腰痛、疼痛定位与骶髂关节起源相符、骶髂关节压痛且腰椎无明显疼痛来源的患者进行双侧麻醉阻滞。该过程包括通过视觉模拟量表进行临床检查、进行骶髂关节疼痛激发试验,然后用短效麻醉剂进行首次筛查阻滞。由相同测试组成的第二次检查评估首次阻滞的效果。如果结果为阳性,则进行确认性阻滞。所有阻滞均在透视引导下进行。
19例患者对首次阻滞有阳性反应。其中,10例(18.5%)通过确认性阻滞得到暂时缓解。没有疼痛激发试验达到统计学意义。
本研究表明骶髂关节是下腰痛的一个不常见但真实的来源。一些假定的“骶髂关节疼痛激发试验”的准确性受到质疑。