Begg M D, Panageas K S, Mitchell-Lewis D, Bucklan R S, Phelan J A, Lamster I B
Center for Oral HIV Studies, Columbia University School of Dental and Oral Surgery, New York, N.Y. USA.
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1996 Sep;82(3):276-83. doi: 10.1016/s1079-2104(96)80352-0.
We examined the diagnostic utility of the presence of oral lesions, individually and in combination, in identifying severe immunosuppression, defined as CD4 cell count under 200.
Data were collected on 82 HIV-seropositive homosexual men and 82 HIV-seropositive injection drug users who volunteered to participate in a longitudinal study of HIV infection. CD4 cell counts were measured within 24 hours of oral examination.
Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and the odds ratio were computed to assess the association between oral lesions and CD4 less than 200. In addition to the individual lesions, we studied the diagnostic properties of sets of three to six lesions. For each set of lesions, a patient was classified as positive for the set if he or she had one or more lesions in that set.
In homosexual men and injection drug users, individual lesions had low sensitivity, high specificity, and moderate positive and negative predictive values. Odds ratios reflected weak correlation to immunosuppression. When lesion sets were considered in homosexual men, sensitivity rose dramatically with only modest decreases in specificity. The positive and negative predictive values remained almost the same. Similar results for lesion sets were obtained in injection drug users, with greater reduction in specificity but stable positive and negative predictive values. Odds ratios indicated that for homosexual men, the more lesions included in the set, the stronger the correlation with immunosuppression. For injection drug users, strong correlations were observed for all lesion sets.
Analysis of sensitivities and odds ratios in homosexual men suggest that it may be valid to note the occurrence of a greater number of oral lesions than is currently done in staging patients with HIV infection. Among injection drug users, monitoring a larger number of lesions neither improves nor reduces the correlation to severe immunosuppression.
我们研究了口腔病变单独及联合存在时在识别严重免疫抑制(定义为CD4细胞计数低于200)方面的诊断效用。
收集了82名HIV血清阳性同性恋男性和82名HIV血清阳性注射吸毒者的数据,这些人自愿参与一项HIV感染纵向研究。在口腔检查后24小时内测量CD4细胞计数。
计算敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值、阴性预测值和比值比,以评估口腔病变与CD4低于200之间的关联。除了单个病变外,我们还研究了三到六个病变组合的诊断特性。对于每组病变,如果患者在该组中有一个或多个病变,则将其分类为该组阳性。
在同性恋男性和注射吸毒者中,单个病变的敏感性低、特异性高,阳性和阴性预测值中等。比值比反映了与免疫抑制的弱相关性。在同性恋男性中考虑病变组合时,敏感性显著提高,而特异性仅适度下降。阳性和阴性预测值几乎保持不变。在注射吸毒者中也获得了类似的病变组合结果,特异性下降幅度更大,但阳性和阴性预测值稳定。比值比表明,对于同性恋男性,组合中包含的病变越多,与免疫抑制的相关性越强。对于注射吸毒者,所有病变组合均观察到强相关性。
对同性恋男性的敏感性和比值比分析表明,在对HIV感染患者进行分期时,记录比目前更多的口腔病变可能是有效的。在注射吸毒者中,监测更多的病变既不会提高也不会降低与严重免疫抑制的相关性。