Suppr超能文献

头孢呋辛与阿莫西林-克拉维酸治疗社区获得性肺炎的比较。

Cefuroxime compared to amoxicillin-clavulanic acid in the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia.

作者信息

Oh H M, Ng A W, Lee S K

机构信息

Department of Infectious Diseases, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore.

出版信息

Singapore Med J. 1996 Jun;37(3):255-7.

PMID:8942221
Abstract

The study compared the efficacy and safety of cefuroxime (CFX) versus amoxicillin-clavulanic acid (AC) in the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia. A total of 48 patients (mean age 44 years; 32 males and 16 females) were randomised to receive sequential intravenous/oral CFX (750 mg i.v. 8H for 48 H/500 mg p.o bid) and sequential intravenous/oral AC (1.2 g i.v. 8 H for 48 H/ 750 mg p.o. tid) for 7-14 days. The two groups were well matched for age, sex and treatment duration (median 7 days). The most frequent causative organisms were Mycoplasma (3), Klebsiella species (2), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (2) and hemolytic streptococcus (2). clinical cure was obtained in 20 patients (83.3%) and 18 patients (75%) of CFX and AC group respectively. Clinical improvement was observed in one patient of the CFX group. There were 3 failures in the CFX group and 4 failures in the AC group. Two patients in the AC group developed adverse drug reactions (namely vomiting and rash) and were withdrawn from the study. In conclusion, cefuroxime and amoxicillin-clavulanic acid have comparable efficacy and safety in the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia.

摘要

该研究比较了头孢呋辛(CFX)与阿莫西林-克拉维酸(AC)治疗社区获得性肺炎的疗效和安全性。总共48例患者(平均年龄44岁;男性32例,女性16例)被随机分配接受序贯静脉/口服CFX(静脉注射750mg,每8小时一次,共48小时/口服500mg,每日两次)和序贯静脉/口服AC(静脉注射1.2g,每8小时一次,共48小时/口服750mg,每日三次)治疗7 - 14天。两组在年龄、性别和治疗时长(中位数7天)方面匹配良好。最常见的病原体为支原体(3例)、克雷伯菌属(2例)、铜绿假单胞菌(2例)和溶血性链球菌(2例)。CFX组和AC组分别有20例(83.3%)和18例(75%)患者获得临床治愈。CFX组有1例患者出现临床改善。CFX组有3例治疗失败,AC组有4例治疗失败。AC组有2例患者出现药物不良反应(即呕吐和皮疹)并退出研究。总之,头孢呋辛和阿莫西林-克拉维酸在治疗社区获得性肺炎方面具有相当的疗效和安全性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验