多重危险因素干预试验（MRFIT）。回归一项具有里程碑意义的试验。 - Suppr

Suppr

超能文献

The Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial (MRFIT). A return to a landmark trial.

作者信息

Gotto A M

机构信息

Office of the Dean, Cornell University Medical College, New York, NY 10021, USA.

出版信息

JAMA. 1997 Feb 19;277(7):595-7.

PMID:9032169

Abstract

摘要

相似文献

The Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial (MRFIT). A return to a landmark trial.多重危险因素干预试验（MRFIT）。回归一项具有里程碑意义的试验。

JAMA. 1997 Feb 19;277(7):595-7.

Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial. Risk factor changes and mortality results. Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial Research Group. 1982.多重危险因素干预试验。危险因素变化与死亡率结果。多重危险因素干预试验研究组。1982年。

JAMA. 1997 Feb 19;277(7):582-94.

[Possibilities and strategies for prevention of ischemic heart disease. Risk factors, trials, mass and individual strategies].[缺血性心脏病的预防可能性与策略。危险因素、试验、群体及个体策略]

G Ital Cardiol. 1989 Sep;19(9):770-7; discussion 778-86.

[The biological bases for prevention].

G Ital Cardiol. 1989 Sep;19(9):763-9; discussion 778-86.

A case of data alteration in the Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial (MRFIT). The MRFIT Research Group.多重危险因素干预试验（MRFIT）中的一例数据篡改事件。MRFIT研究小组。

Control Clin Trials. 1991 Dec;12(6):731-40. doi: 10.1016/0197-2456(91)90036-l.

The multiple risk factor intervention trial (MRFIT): implications for nurses.多重危险因素干预试验（MRFIT）：对护士的启示

Prog Cardiovasc Nurs. 1987 Jul-Sep;2(3):92-9.

[Primary prevention of ischemic heart disease].

Med Sestra. 1987 Jul;46(7):12-6.

In people with no evidence of cardiovascular disease, how effective are interventions aimed at controlling risk factors in reducing all-cause and coronary artery disease mortality?在没有心血管疾病证据的人群中，旨在控制风险因素的干预措施在降低全因死亡率和冠状动脉疾病死亡率方面的效果如何？

West J Med. 2000 Sep;173(3):185-6. doi: 10.1136/ewjm.173.3.185.

[Multifactorial primary prevention trials in ischemic heart disease].

Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique. 1985;33(2):121-33.

CHD and stroke: Scotland's pandemics also need co-ordinated and vigorous primary prevention programmes.冠心病与中风：苏格兰的这些大流行病同样需要协调且有力的一级预防项目。

Scott Med J. 2003 Aug;48(3):69-72. doi: 10.1177/003693300304800303.

引用本文的文献

Obesity Paradox in Recurrent Attacks of Gout in Observational Studies: Clarification and Remedy.观察性研究中痛风复发发作的肥胖悖论：阐释与补救

Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2017 Apr;69(4):561-566. doi: 10.1002/acr.22954.

Multiple risk factor intervention trial revisited: a new perspective based on nonfatal and fatal composite endpoints, coronary and cardiovascular, during the trial.再次审视多项危险因素干预试验：基于试验期间非致死性和致死性复合终点、冠状动脉和心血管的新视角。

J Am Heart Assoc. 2012 Oct;1(5):e003640. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.112.003640. Epub 2012 Oct 25.

Derivation, validation, and evaluation of a new QRISK model to estimate lifetime risk of cardiovascular disease: cohort study using QResearch database.基于 QResearch 数据库的队列研究：推导、验证和评估一种新的 QRISK 模型以估计心血管疾病终生风险

BMJ. 2010 Dec 9;341:c6624. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c6624.

Low levels of awareness of suboptimal health conditions in a high-risk working population: the "better health for better Hong Kong" health promotion campaign.高危工作人群对亚健康状况的认知水平较低：“健康香港，活力无限”健康促进活动

Int J Behav Med. 2007;14(2):63-9. doi: 10.1007/BF03004170.

[Genetic risk factors for myocardial infarct].[心肌梗死的遗传风险因素]

Herz. 2000 Feb;25(1):7-14. doi: 10.1007/BF03044119.

Estimating cardiovascular risk for primary prevention: outstanding questions for primary care.评估一级预防中的心血管风险：基层医疗面临的突出问题

BMJ. 2000 Mar 11;320(7236):702-4. doi: 10.1136/bmj.320.7236.702.

Follow up care in general practice of patients with myocardial infarction and angina. Trial was underpowered.心肌梗死和心绞痛患者在全科医疗中的随访护理。该试验效能不足。

BMJ. 1999 Aug 7;319(7206):380-1. doi: 10.1136/bmj.319.7206.380.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述，助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型，支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验