Tramonte S M, Brand M B, Mulrow C D, Amato M G, O'Keefe M E, Ramirez G
Metropolitan Methodist Hospital, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, USA.
J Gen Intern Med. 1997 Jan;12(1):15-24. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.1997.12103.x.
To evaluate whether laxatives and fiber therapies improve symptoms and bowel movement frequency in adults with chronic constipation.
English language studies were identified from computerized MEDLINE (1966-1995). Biological Abstracts (1990-1995), and Micromedex searches; bibliographies; textbooks; laxative manufactures; and experts.
Randomized trials of laxative or fiber therapies lasting more than 1 week that evaluated clinical outcomes in adults with chronic constipation.
Two independent reviewers appraised each trial's characteristics including methodologic quality. There were 36 trials involving 1,815 persons from a variety of settings including clinics, hospitals and nursing homes. Twenty-three trials were 1 month or less in duration. Several laxative and fiber preparations were evaluated. Twenty trials had a placebo, usual care, or discontinuation of laxative control group, and 16 directly compared different agents. Laxatives and fiber increased bowel movement frequency by an overall weighted average of 1.4 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.1-1.8) bowel movements per week. Fiber and bulk laxatives decreased abdominal pain and improved stool consistency compared with placebo. Most nonbulk laxative data concerning abdominal pain and stool consistency were inconclusive, though cisapride, lactulose, and lactitol improved consistency. Data concerning superiority of various treatments were inconclusive. No severe side effects for any of the therapies were reported.
Both fiber and laxatives modestly improved bowel movement frequency in adults with chronic constipation. There was inadequate evidence to establish whether fiber was superior to laxatives or one laxative class was superior to another.
评估缓泻剂和纤维疗法是否能改善慢性便秘成人的症状及排便频率。
通过计算机检索MEDLINE(1966 - 1995年)、生物学文摘数据库(1990 - 1995年)以及Micromedex数据库获取英文研究;查阅参考文献、教科书、缓泻剂制造商资料并咨询专家。
持续时间超过1周的缓泻剂或纤维疗法随机试验,评估慢性便秘成人的临床结局。
两名独立评审员评估每项试验的特征,包括方法学质量。共有36项试验,涉及来自诊所、医院和疗养院等不同机构的1815人。23项试验持续时间为1个月或更短。评估了几种缓泻剂和纤维制剂。20项试验设有安慰剂、常规护理或停用缓泻剂的对照组,16项试验直接比较了不同药物。缓泻剂和纤维使排便频率总体加权平均每周增加1.4次(95%置信区间[CI] 1.1 - 1.8)。与安慰剂相比,纤维和容积性缓泻剂可减轻腹痛并改善粪便稠度。大多数关于非容积性缓泻剂对腹痛和粪便稠度影响的数据尚无定论,不过西沙必利、乳果糖和乳糖醇可改善粪便稠度。关于各种治疗方法优越性的数据尚无定论。未报告任何一种疗法有严重副作用。
纤维和缓泻剂均可适度改善慢性便秘成人的排便频率。尚无足够证据确定纤维是否优于缓泻剂或某一类缓泻剂是否优于另一类。