Fisman E Z, Embon P, Pines A, Tenenbaum A, Drory Y, Shapira I, Motro M
Cardiac Rehabilitation Institute, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer, Israel.
Am J Cardiol. 1997 Feb 1;79(3):355-9. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(96)00761-8.
It is unclear whether cardiovascular responses to heavy isometric exercise are changed by intensive training. We evaluated the effects of this type of exercise on left ventricular (LV) function in athletes engaged in static and dynamic sport, compared with sedentary persons, and looked for peculiarities in static athletes' responses that might reflect adaptive mechanisms to their specific activity. The study population comprised 45 men (age 24 +/- 5 years): 29 dynamic and 16 static athletes (runners and weightlifters, respectively). The control group consisted of 20 age and gender-matched healthy sedentary persons. All performed 50% of maximal voluntary contraction on a whole-body isometric exercise device for 2 minutes. Echocardiographic calculations were determined at rest and exercise. Upon exercise, stroke volume, cardiac output, end-diastolic volume, and ejection fraction increased significantly in athletes, while end-systolic volume and systemic vascular resistance decreased. In sedentary persons, stroke volume and resistance remained unchanged, cardiac output and LV volumes increased, and ejection fraction decreased from 67 +/- 5% to 60 +/- 5% (p <0.01 compared with rest; p <0.0001 compared with athletes). Whereas peak flow velocity decreased from 103 +/- 10 to 81 +/- 6 cm/s in sedentary persons, it increased from 112 +/- 9 to 126 +/- 8 cm/s in the static group and from 120 +/-3 to 126 +/- 9 cm/s in the dynamic athletes (p <0.0001 compared with the sedentary group). Mean acceleration decreased in the sedentary group, remained unchanged among the dynamic athletes, and increased among the static athletes. We conclude that cardiovascular responses to heavy isometric exercise are modified by intensive training. Athletes, taken as a group, react differently and adapt better than sedentary individuals. Moreover, among them, those involved in static sport show an improved cardiovascular adaptation to this type of exercise.
尚不清楚强化训练是否会改变对重度等长运动的心血管反应。我们评估了这类运动对从事静态和动态运动的运动员左心室(LV)功能的影响,并与久坐不动的人进行比较,同时寻找静态运动员反应中的特殊之处,这些特殊之处可能反映了他们对特定活动的适应性机制。研究人群包括45名男性(年龄24±5岁):29名动态运动员和16名静态运动员(分别为跑步运动员和举重运动员)。对照组由20名年龄和性别匹配的健康久坐不动的人组成。所有人在全身等长运动设备上进行了2分钟的最大自主收缩的50%。在静息和运动状态下进行超声心动图计算。运动时,运动员的每搏输出量、心输出量、舒张末期容积和射血分数显著增加,而收缩末期容积和全身血管阻力降低。在久坐不动的人中,每搏输出量和阻力保持不变,心输出量和左心室容积增加,射血分数从67±5%降至60±5%(与静息状态相比,p<0.01;与运动员相比,p<0.0001)。久坐不动的人的峰值流速从103±10降至81±6 cm/s,而静态组从112±9增至126±8 cm/s;动态运动员从120±3增至126±9 cm/s(与久坐不动组相比,p<于久坐不动组相比,p<0.0001)。久坐不动组的平均加速度降低;动态运动员中保持不变;静态运动员中增加。我们得出结论,强化训练会改变对重度等长运动的心血管反应运动员作为一个群体比久坐不动的个体反应不同且适应更好此外在他们之中从事静态运动的人对这类运动表现出更好的心血管适应性