Suppr超能文献

静脉注射咪达唑仑和氯胺酮用于儿童治疗和诊断操作镇静的有效性和安全性。

Efficacy and safety of intravenous midazolam and ketamine as sedation for therapeutic and diagnostic procedures in children.

作者信息

Parker R I, Mahan R A, Giugliano D, Parker M M

机构信息

Department of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, State University of New York at Stony Brook, 11794-8111, USA.

出版信息

Pediatrics. 1997 Mar;99(3):427-31. doi: 10.1542/peds.99.3.427.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

We have used the combination of midazolam, a short-acting benzodiazepine, and ketamine, a "dissociative anesthetic," to provide conscious sedation for invasive or lengthy procedures.

METHODS

A total of 350 procedures (74 lumbar punctures, 97 bone marrow aspirations or biopsies, 84 radiotherapy sessions, and 95 imaging studies) were performed on 68 children, 4 months to 17 years of age, in both inpatient and ambulatory settings. All patients had an intravenous line in place and were monitored for heart rate and O2 saturation by pulse oximetry for the duration of the procedure and recovery time. Blood pressure was monitored periodically (every 5 to 30 minutes). Oxygen and suction equipment was available during the procedure. In addition to the individual performing the procedure, a second staff member trained in airway management (eg, physician, nurse practitioner, or registered nurse) was present to monitor vital signs and respiratory status. Patients were sedated initially with midazolam (0.05 to 0.1 mg/kg intravenously; maximum single dose of 2 mg, maximum total dose of 4 mg), followed by ketamine (1 to 2 mg/kg intravenously). During lengthy procedures, additional doses of ketamine (0.5 to 1 mg/kg) were given as necessary. Effectiveness of the sedation, recovery time, and adverse events associated with the sedative regimen were documented.

RESULTS

All patients were effectively sedated with this regimen. Four patients experienced transient decrease in O2 saturation (<85%) requiring temporary interruption of the procedure and oxygen by blow-by; the procedure was subsequently completed without incident in each case. Two patients experienced significant agitation during recovery from sedation. This side effect resolved spontaneously after 5 to 10 minutes in one patient and was effectively treated with diphenhydramine hydrochloride in the other. Twenty-four lumbar punctures were associated with transient decrease in O2 saturation (88% to 92%), which improved by relief of neck flexion and/or blow-by oxygen. No hypotension, bradycardia, or respiratory depression requiring respiratory support or reversal of sedation was noted. Anesthesia recovery time ranged from <15 minutes to 120 minutes with >70% of patients recovering within 30 minutes. Most patients demonstrated an increase in oral secretions requiring occasional suctioning. Transient sleep disturbances were reported in only two patients.

CONCLUSIONS

This sedative regimen of intravenous midazolam and ketamine was found to be safe and effective. Its use has greatly reduced patient and parent anxiety for diagnostic and therapeutic procedures.

摘要

目的

我们采用短效苯二氮䓬类药物咪达唑仑与“解离麻醉药”氯胺酮联合使用,为侵入性或耗时较长的操作提供清醒镇静。

方法

对68名4个月至17岁的儿童在住院和门诊环境中进行了总共350项操作(74次腰椎穿刺、97次骨髓穿刺或活检、84次放疗疗程以及95次影像学检查)。所有患者均已建立静脉通路,在操作期间及恢复过程中通过脉搏血氧饱和度仪监测心率和血氧饱和度。定期(每5至30分钟)监测血压。操作过程中备有氧气和吸引设备。除进行操作的人员外,还有一名接受过气道管理培训的工作人员(如医生、执业护士或注册护士)在场监测生命体征和呼吸状况。患者最初用咪达唑仑(静脉注射0.05至0.1mg/kg;最大单次剂量2mg,最大总剂量4mg)进行镇静,随后给予氯胺酮(静脉注射1至2mg/kg)。在耗时较长的操作中,必要时追加氯胺酮剂量(0.5至1mg/kg)。记录镇静效果、恢复时间以及与镇静方案相关的不良事件。

结果

采用该方案所有患者均获得有效镇静。4名患者出现血氧饱和度短暂下降(<85%),需要暂时中断操作并通过吹氧给氧;随后每项操作均顺利完成。2名患者在镇静恢复过程中出现明显躁动。其中1名患者在5至10分钟后这种副作用自行缓解,另1名患者用盐酸苯海拉明有效治疗。24次腰椎穿刺与血氧饱和度短暂下降(88%至92%)相关,通过缓解颈部屈曲和/或吹氧改善。未观察到需要呼吸支持或逆转镇静的低血压、心动过缓或呼吸抑制。麻醉恢复时间从<15分钟至120分钟不等,超过70%的患者在30分钟内恢复。大多数患者出现口腔分泌物增多,需要偶尔吸引。仅2名患者报告有短暂睡眠障碍。

结论

静脉注射咪达唑仑和氯胺酮的这种镇静方案被发现是安全有效的。其使用极大地减轻了患者和家长对诊断和治疗操作的焦虑。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验