Kukafka D S, O'Brien G M, Furukawa S, Criner G J
Department of Medicine, Temple University School of Medicine, Philadelphia.
Chest. 1997 Feb;111(2):377-81. doi: 10.1378/chest.111.2.377.
To establish whether a consensus exists among active transplant centers regarding the use and interpretation of information obtained by surveillance bronchoscopic lung biopsy (SBLB).
Prospective standardized questionnaire answered via mail and telephone communications.
A five page, 18-question survey was sent to all lung transplant programs listed by the United Network of Organ Sharing in North America, as well as eight selected international programs. Ninety-one surveys were sent to 83 North American and eight international programs. Seventy-four programs (81%) responded. Seventeen programs (19%) were excluded secondary to inactivity. The remaining 57 programs (63%) were included in final data analysis.
None.
Sixty-eight percent (39/57) of the responding programs perform SBLBs. Ninety-two percent of the programs performing SBLBs do so within the first month, and 69% continue to do so on a regular basis. Sixty-nine percent (27/39) of programs performing SBLBs continue to do so after 1 year. Eighty-six percent (32/37) of respondents believe that SBLB impacts on patient management at least 10% of the time. Technically, 90% (35/39) take biopsy specimens from more than one lobe per SBLB session. Fifty-nine percent (23/39) took 6 to 10 biopsy specimens per session, 33% (13/39) took three to five biopsy specimens, and 7% (4/39) took > 10 biopsy specimens per session. Eighty-six percent (32/37) of the responding centers reported treating asymptomatic rejection at grade 2A, while 14% (5/37) waited until histologic grade 3A before beginning treatment. Complications from SBLB were minimal with < 5% rates of pneumothorax, requirement for chest tube placements, or significant bleeding during SBLB reported by > 95% of the programs performing SBLB.
Most active lung transplant centers perform SBLBs and do so on a regular basis. However, a wide range of opinion exists over the utility and technique of SBLB and the impact of its results influencing outcome in the lung transplant recipient. To answer these questions, a randomized multicentered trial or registry to determine the effect of SBLB on lung transplant recipient morbidity and mortality is required.
确定活跃的移植中心在监测性支气管镜肺活检(SBLB)所获信息的使用和解读方面是否存在共识。
通过邮件和电话通信进行前瞻性标准化问卷调查。
向北美器官共享联合网络列出的所有肺移植项目以及八个选定的国际项目发送了一份五页、包含18个问题的调查问卷。共向83个北美项目和8个国际项目发送了91份调查问卷。74个项目(81%)做出了回应。17个项目(19%)因不活跃而被排除。其余57个项目(63%)被纳入最终数据分析。
无。
68%(39/57)的回应项目开展SBLB。开展SBLB的项目中,92%在第一个月内进行,69%持续定期进行。开展SBLB的项目中,69%(27/39)在1年后仍继续进行。86%(32/37)的受访者认为SBLB至少在10%的情况下会影响患者管理。从技术角度而言,90%(35/39)的项目每次SBLB操作从多个肺叶获取活检标本。59%(23/39)的项目每次操作获取6至10份活检标本,33%(13/39)获取3至5份活检标本,7%(4/39)每次操作获取超过10份活检标本。86%(32/37)的回应中心报告对2A级无症状排斥进行治疗,而14%(5/37)的中心会等到组织学3A级才开始治疗。SBLB的并发症极少,开展SBLB的项目中超过95%报告气胸、需要放置胸管或SBLB期间严重出血的发生率低于5%。
大多数活跃的肺移植中心开展SBLB且定期进行。然而,对于SBLB的效用和技术以及其结果对肺移植受者预后的影响存在广泛的意见分歧。为回答这些问题,需要进行一项随机多中心试验或登记研究以确定SBLB对肺移植受者发病率和死亡率的影响。