Westra S J, Levy D J, Chaloupka J C, Hill J A, Robert J M, Sayre J W, Viñuela F
Department of Radiological Sciences, University of California, School of Medicine, Los Angeles 90095-1721, USA.
Radiology. 1997 Mar;202(3):725-9. doi: 10.1148/radiology.202.3.9051025.
To evaluate carotid artery volume-flow measurements with time-domain-processing ultrasonography (US).
Volume-flow measurements were obtained in the carotid arteries of nine swine with time-domain-processing US. Four swine were prepared with a model of an arteriovenous shunt. Flow through the carotid artery was varied by means of a number of physiologic and pharmacologic interventions. The reference standard for volume flow consisted of measurements with transit-time US flowmetry. At a limited number of measurement points, this reference standard was validated against true volume flow measured with timed collection.
For flow rates less than 500 mL/min, a linear correlation existed between measurements with time-domain processing and the US flow meter (r2 = .96, P < .001, slope = 1.117). Values above 500 mL/min were less well correlated with the reference standard. True flow was underestimated with both methods, less so with time-domain processing than with US flowmetry (underestimation, 10% versus 21%). Measurements were significantly less reproducible with time-domain processing than with US flowmetry (P < .001). Interobserver variability was negligible.
Because of operator errors, measurements with time-domain processing should be repeated at least three times to ensure accuracy and may be inaccurate in flow rates over 500 mL/min.