Hernefalk L, Messner K
Department of Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, University Hospital, Linkoping, Sweden.
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 1996;115(2):71-4. doi: 10.1007/BF00573444.
The influence of three different fixation devices on late healing complications after femoral neck fractures was studied in a large patient group from three different hospitals. Except for the choice of device, which was unique to each hospital, all other factors having a potential influence on the late outcome, such as sex and age of the patients, initial degree of fracture dislocation and quality of surgical reduction were similar among the three groups. Within a 2-year observation period the incidence of late segmental collapses (14%-19%) was not related to choice of device, but a higher number of non-unions (27%-30%) occurred after adaptive non-rigid methods using screws (von Bahr) or a flanged nail (Rydell) than after a more rigid osteosynthesis (8%, Deyerle). Using such a rigid fixation, the complication rate could be reduced by one-third and the need for revision surgery halved. A device providing stable fixation should be preferred for treatment of femoral neck fractures in the elderly to prevent the healing complications related to insufficient stabilization.
在来自三家不同医院的一大组患者中,研究了三种不同固定装置对股骨颈骨折后晚期愈合并发症的影响。除了各医院独有的装置选择外,其他所有可能对晚期结果产生影响的因素,如患者的性别和年龄、骨折脱位的初始程度以及手术复位质量,在三组之间是相似的。在2年的观察期内,晚期节段性塌陷的发生率(14%-19%)与装置的选择无关,但与使用螺钉(冯·巴尔)或带凸缘钉(赖德尔)的适应性非刚性方法相比,在采用更刚性的骨固定术(8%,戴耶勒)后,出现的骨不连数量更多(27%-30%)。采用这种刚性固定,并发症发生率可降低三分之一,翻修手术的需求减半。对于老年股骨颈骨折的治疗,应首选能提供稳定固定的装置,以预防与固定不足相关的愈合并发症。