Baumann I, Greschniok A, Bootz F, Kaiserling E
Universitäts-HNO-Klinik Tübingen.
HNO. 1996 Nov;44(11):616-23. doi: 10.1007/s001060050066.
It remains a controversial question whether or not the anastomosis of sensory nerves is necessary in free transplants of microvascularly reanastomosed radial forearm flaps in the oral cavity and oropharynx. Some authors perform this routinely because they expect fewer complications in a skin with a sensory nerve supply. We carried out clinical and morphological examinations in 20 patients in order to determine the sensory innervation of the transplanted tissue. All patients received free transplants of microvasculary reanastomosed radial forearm flaps during a tumor operation in the oral cavity or oropharynx. Postoperative wound healing proceeded without complications in all but three cases, but these disturbances were insufficient to explain any deficit in sensation in the operated areas. Following surgery, sensation was determined clinically by two-point discrimination. Morphological studies of 20 flap biopsies using conventional colored light microscopy demonstrated nerve fibers in 14 of the biopsies. Immunohistochemical investigations also showed the presence of small nerve fibers by proving S-100 positive Schwann cells. We could not find a correlation between the demonstration of nerve fibers and the use of radiation (or an increased radiation dosage) following surgery. These findings suggest that nerve regeneration was completed just before the 6th postoperative month, which was the earliest time recorded in this study. Perivascular (vegetative) nerves showed a delayed regeneration and could be demonstrated only 36 months after operation. Histological investigations of the transplanted tissue showed a decrease in keratin with a partial increase in parakeratosis, a loss of skin structures and nearly always chronic inflammation. Our findings verify that a sensory innervation is possible in free transplanted radial forearm flaps by the regeneration of nerves coming from the transplantation bed and/or adjacent (oral) mucosa. This leads to a sensation comparable to that of healthy mucosa. These findings also indicate that there is no need for the anastomosis of sensory nerves during transplant surgery.
在口腔和口咽部位进行微血管再吻合的桡侧前臂皮瓣游离移植时,感觉神经吻合是否必要仍是一个有争议的问题。一些作者常规进行这种吻合,因为他们预计有感觉神经供应的皮肤并发症会更少。我们对20例患者进行了临床和形态学检查,以确定移植组织的感觉神经支配情况。所有患者在口腔或口咽肿瘤手术期间接受了微血管再吻合的桡侧前臂皮瓣游离移植。除3例患者外,所有患者术后伤口愈合均无并发症,但这些干扰不足以解释手术区域感觉的任何缺失。术后,通过两点辨别法进行临床感觉测定。使用传统彩色光学显微镜对20块皮瓣活检组织进行的形态学研究显示,14块活检组织中有神经纤维。免疫组织化学研究通过证实S - 100阳性施万细胞也显示存在小神经纤维。我们未发现神经纤维的显示与术后放疗(或增加放疗剂量)之间存在相关性。这些发现表明,神经再生在术后第6个月之前完成,这是本研究记录的最早时间。血管周围(营养性)神经再生延迟,仅在术后36个月才能显示出来。移植组织的组织学检查显示角质形成减少,不全角化部分增加,皮肤结构丧失且几乎总是存在慢性炎症。我们的研究结果证实,通过来自移植床和/或相邻(口腔)黏膜的神经再生,游离移植的桡侧前臂皮瓣有可能实现感觉神经支配。这导致感觉与健康黏膜相当。这些发现还表明,移植手术期间无需进行感觉神经吻合。