Fernandez C, Sainz R D
Department of Animal Science, University of California, Davis 95616, USA.
Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1997 Mar;214(3):242-7. doi: 10.3181/00379727-214-44092.
To assess the importance of different proteolytic pathways in anabolic and catabolic states, L6 myotubes were labeled with 3H-phenylalanine for 24 hr, then exposed for another 24 hr to control medium, alone or with one of the following: insulin (1 microgram/ml), insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I, 100 ng/ml), clenbuterol (100 microM), or dexamethasone (1 microM). Release of acid-soluble radioactivity and 3-methylhistidine were used to determine rates of total and myofibrillar protein degradation, respectively. Within each hormone treatment, cells were also exposed to none, one, or both of the following protease inhibitors: chloroquine (25 microM); E-64d (100 microM). Chloroquine inhibits lysosomal proteases, and E-64d is a cell-penetrating inhibitor of cysteine proteases (including the calpains). Total protein degradation was reduced by insulin (-33%) and IGF-I (-40%), increased by clenbuterol (+20%), and was unaffected by dexamethasone. Myofibrillar protein degradation was reduced by insulin (-35%), IGF-I (-55%), and clenbuterol (-22%), and was unaffected by dexamethasone. Therefore, total (mainly sarcoplasmic) and myofibrillar protein degradation were regulated independently of one another. The influence of the inhibitors was not consistent across hormone treatments. Chloroquine inhibited total but not myofibrillar proteolysis, indicating that lysosomes may be rate limiting in the former but not the latter. In contrast, E-64d had no effect on total protein degradation, but increased myofibrillar proteolysis. Interactions between anabolic and catabolic hormones and these two protease inhibitors indicate that both lysosomal and nonlysosomal proteolytic pathways are involved in regulation of total protein degradation in myotubes. In contrast, lysosomes are probably not involved in regulating the rate of myofibrillar protein degradation, the initial step likely being due to calpain activity.
为评估不同蛋白水解途径在合成代谢和分解代谢状态中的重要性,将L6肌管用³H-苯丙氨酸标记24小时,然后再单独或与下列之一共同暴露于对照培养基中24小时:胰岛素(1微克/毫升)、胰岛素样生长因子-I(IGF-I,100纳克/毫升)、克伦特罗(100微摩尔)或地塞米松(1微摩尔)。分别用酸溶性放射性物质和3-甲基组氨酸的释放量来测定总蛋白和肌原纤维蛋白的降解速率。在每种激素处理中,细胞还分别暴露于以下蛋白酶抑制剂中的无、一种或两种:氯喹(25微摩尔);E-64d(100微摩尔)。氯喹抑制溶酶体蛋白酶,E-64d是一种细胞穿透性半胱氨酸蛋白酶抑制剂(包括钙蛋白酶)。胰岛素(-33%)和IGF-I(-40%)降低总蛋白降解,克伦特罗(+20%)增加总蛋白降解,地塞米松对总蛋白降解无影响。胰岛素(-35%)、IGF-I(-55%)和克伦特罗(-22%)降低肌原纤维蛋白降解,地塞米松对肌原纤维蛋白降解无影响。因此,总蛋白(主要是肌浆蛋白)和肌原纤维蛋白的降解相互独立调节。抑制剂的影响在不同激素处理中并不一致。氯喹抑制总蛋白水解但不抑制肌原纤维蛋白水解,表明溶酶体可能在前者中是限速因素,而在后者中不是。相反,E-64d对总蛋白降解无影响,但增加肌原纤维蛋白水解。合成代谢和分解代谢激素与这两种蛋白酶抑制剂之间的相互作用表明,溶酶体和非溶酶体蛋白水解途径均参与肌管中总蛋白降解的调节。相反,溶酶体可能不参与调节肌原纤维蛋白降解速率,其初始步骤可能归因于钙蛋白酶活性。