Hutten M M, Hermens H J
Roessingh Research and Development, Enschede, The Netherlands.
Eur Spine J. 1997;6(1):54-62. doi: 10.1007/BF01676575.
Lumbar dynamometry is a potentially useful method for assessing the state of trunk muscles in low back pain (LBP) patients. The purpose of this study was to assess the reliability of lumbar dynamometry measurements in chronic LBP patients by conducting test-retest measurements on different days. Thirty-one men and 14 women with chronic LBP participated in this study. The experiments consisted of three sets of lumbar dynamometry measurements (Isostation B200) carried out on three different days with a 2- to 3-day interval. A standard protocol was administered to all subjects, consisting of a range-of-motion measurement about each axis, a 5 s maximum isometric trial about each axis and five dynamic repetitions about each axis against a resistance set at 25% and at 50% of the maximum isometric torque. Correlation coefficients and regression analysis were used to detect possible learning effects. One-way anova and regression analysis were used to assess the reliability of the measurements. High coefficients were found for the correlation between the first and second lumbar dynamometry measurements. Regression analysis showed that the differences between those measurements were not significant. This means that there was no learning effect operating between the first and second lumbar dynamometry measurements. One-way anova showed a reliability higher than 0.90 for the torque and velocity parameters. Reliability for the range-of-motion parameters was somewhat lower: between 0.76 and 0.94. Regression analysis showed no significant differences between the second and third measurements for the torque and velocity parameters. For range-of-motion parameters significant differences were found. From this study it can be concluded that the Isostation B200 provides reliable measures of torque and velocity parameters, but measures of the range-of-motion parameters are unreliable. No learning effect operates between the first and second lumbar dynamometry measurements, which means that a single measurement, with prior warming up and practice, is sufficient to assess the performance of the LBP patient.
腰椎测力法是评估腰痛(LBP)患者躯干肌肉状态的一种潜在有用方法。本研究的目的是通过在不同日期进行重测,评估慢性LBP患者腰椎测力测量的可靠性。31名男性和14名患有慢性LBP的女性参与了本研究。实验包括在三个不同日期进行的三组腰椎测力测量(Isostation B200),间隔为2至3天。对所有受试者采用标准方案,包括围绕每个轴的活动范围测量、围绕每个轴的5秒最大等长试验以及围绕每个轴针对设置为最大等长扭矩25%和50%的阻力进行的五次动态重复。使用相关系数和回归分析来检测可能的学习效应。单向方差分析和回归分析用于评估测量的可靠性。在第一次和第二次腰椎测力测量之间发现了较高的相关系数。回归分析表明,这些测量之间的差异不显著。这意味着在第一次和第二次腰椎测力测量之间没有学习效应。单向方差分析显示扭矩和速度参数的可靠性高于0.90。活动范围参数的可靠性略低:在0.76至0.94之间。回归分析表明,扭矩和速度参数的第二次和第三次测量之间没有显著差异。对于活动范围参数,发现了显著差异。从本研究可以得出结论,Isostation B200提供了可靠的扭矩和速度参数测量,但活动范围参数的测量不可靠。在第一次和第二次腰椎测力测量之间没有学习效应,这意味着在预先热身和练习后,单次测量足以评估LBP患者的表现。