Petropoulos V C, Smith W, Kousvelari E
Department of Restorative Dentistry, University of Pennsylvania, School of Dental Medicine, Philadelphia 19104-6003, USA.
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1997 Mar-Apr;12(2):176-85.
The aim of this study was to compare the retention and release periods of the Nobel Biocare bar and clip (NBC), Nobel Biocare ball (NB), Zest anchor (ZA), Zest magnet (ZM), and Sterngold ERA (SE) attachments on an implant-retained overdenture model. The attachments were tested using two permanently placed Brånemark implants on a test model that was attached to an Instron machine (cross-head speed 50.8 mm/minute). Each attachment had one part embedded in a denture-like housing, and the other part screwed into the implants. Dislodging tensile forces were applied to the housings in two directions simulating function: vertical and oblique. Eight tests were done in two directions with three samples of each attachment. The dislodging forces generated measurements of the peak load, break load, and displacement at peak load and break load. Release periods were calculated using displacements between the peak load and break load and the cross-head speed. Results showed the NBC to be significantly most retentive for the break load when subjected to vertical and oblique forces with mean values and standard deviations of 2104.5 +/- 506.7 g and 1958.1 +/- 165.4 g, respectively. Next most retentive was the SE, followed by the ZA and NB. The ZM was significantly least retentive (127.8 +/- 7.0 g and 143.5 +/- 19.7 g). For the release period, results showed the NBC to have significantly the fastest release period for vertical and oblique forces (1.86 x 10(-3) and 7.35 x 10(-4) minutes). The ZM significantly had the slowest release period for those forces (3.02 x 10(-2) and 2.35 x 10(-2) minutes). The data suggested that the NBC could be selected when a higher degree of retention and fast release period are desired. The next most retentive was the SE; ZM was the least retentive and had the slowest release period.
本研究的目的是比较诺贝尔生物保健杆卡(NBC)、诺贝尔生物保健球(NB)、Zest锚(ZA)、Zest磁体(ZM)和斯特恩戈尔德ERA(SE)附着体在种植体支持覆盖义齿模型上的固位期和释放期。使用两个永久植入的布兰emark种植体,在一个连接到英斯特朗试验机(十字头速度为50.8毫米/分钟)的测试模型上对这些附着体进行测试。每个附着体的一部分嵌入类似义齿的外壳中,另一部分拧入种植体。在模拟功能的两个方向上对外壳施加脱位拉力:垂直方向和倾斜方向。在两个方向上对每个附着体的三个样本进行八次测试。脱位力产生了峰值负荷、断裂负荷以及峰值负荷和断裂负荷时的位移测量值。释放期通过峰值负荷和断裂负荷之间的位移以及十字头速度来计算。结果表明,当受到垂直和倾斜力时,NBC在断裂负荷方面的固位力显著最强,垂直力时平均值和标准差分别为2104.5 +/- 506.7克,倾斜力时为1958.1 +/- 165.4克。其次固位力最强的是SE,其次是ZA和NB。ZM的固位力显著最弱(127.8 +/- 7.0克和143.5 +/- 19.7克)。对于释放期,结果表明NBC在垂直和倾斜力作用下的释放期显著最快(1.86×10⁻³和7.35×10⁻⁴分钟)。对于这些力,ZM的释放期显著最慢(3.02×10⁻²和2.35×10⁻²分钟)。数据表明,当需要更高程度的固位和快速释放期时,可以选择NBC。其次固位力最强的是SE;ZM的固位力最弱且释放期最慢。