Suppr超能文献

圆形双相波可降低心房颤动和心房扑动经静脉导管心脏复律的能量需求。

Rounded biphasic waveform reduces energy requirements for transvenous catheter cardioversion of atrial fibrillation and flutter.

作者信息

Harbinson M T, Allen J D, Imam Z, Dempsey G, Anderson J M, Ayers G M, Adgey A A

机构信息

Regional Medical Cardiology Centre, Royal Victoria Hospital, Belfast, N. Ireland.

出版信息

Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1997 Jan;20(1 Pt 2):226-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1997.tb04848.x.

Abstract

We postulated that reducing peak leading edge shock voltage and its rate of rise (waveform rounding) would reduce energy requirements for cardioversion of AF and AFl, and may therefore reduce patient discomfort. Transvenous defibrillating catheters (In-Control Inc.) were placed in the RAA (active fixation) and the CS of six anesthetized sheep. AF or AFl was induced by electrical stimulation (100 Hz, 2 V; Grass stimulator). A standard trapezoidal biphasic (S) waveform (3-ms duration each phase) was compared with a similar waveform that had the first phase rounded (R). Cardioversion was attempted after 30 seconds of arrhythmia, using a Ventritex HVS-O2 defibrillator modified to allow waveform rounding. Each waveform was randomly tested several times at 100-, 150-, and 200-V leading edges, and percentage cardioversion success calculated. Shock energy was calculated from delivered current and voltage using Flukeview (Fluke, Inc.) software. At 100-V leading edge R (64% success) and S (59%), shocks were similarly efficacious (P = 0.37). However, R delivered less current, voltage, and energy than the comparable S shock (means 1.30 A, 65.0 V, 0.33 J R vs 1.92 A, 94.2 V, 0.47 J S; P = 0.0001). Both waveforms were equally successful at 150 V (88% vs 100%; P = NS) and 200 V (100% vs 100%), but again R delivered less current, voltage, and energy (2.05 A, 102.5 V, 0.82 J R vs 2.78 A, 142.3 V, 1.11 J S at 150 V; 2.76 A, 141.2 V, 1.58 J R vs 3.77 A, 189.4 V, 2.03 J S at 200 V; both P = 0.0001). No arrhythmic or other complications occurred in the 174 shocks delivered. Waveform rounding reduces delivered peak voltage, current, and energy without reducing defibrillation efficacy. To determine if these changes are associated with a reduction in discomfort, patients with AF are currently being cardioverted with these waveforms during electrophysiological studies.

摘要

我们推测,降低前沿冲击电压峰值及其上升速率(波形变圆)将降低房颤和房扑转复所需的能量,因此可能减轻患者的不适。将经静脉除颤导管(In-Control公司)置于6只麻醉绵羊的右心耳(主动固定)和冠状窦。通过电刺激(100Hz,2V;Grass刺激器)诱发房颤或房扑。将标准梯形双相(S)波形(每个阶段持续3毫秒)与第一阶段变圆的类似波形(R)进行比较。心律失常30秒后,使用经改装以允许波形变圆的Ventritex HVS-O2除颤器尝试转复。每个波形在100V、150V和200V前沿随机测试多次,并计算转复成功率。使用福禄克(Fluke)公司的Flukeview软件根据输送的电流和电压计算电击能量。在100V前沿时,R波形(成功率64%)和S波形(成功率59%)的疗效相似(P=0.37)。然而,R波形输送的电流更小、电压更低、能量更少,与相应的S波形电击相比(平均值:R波形1.30A、65.0V、0.33J,S波形1.92A、94.2V、0.47J;P=0.0001)。在150V(88%对100%;P=无显著性差异)和200V(100%对100%)时两种波形同样成功,但R波形再次输送的电流更小、电压更低、能量更少(150V时,R波形2.05A、102.5V、0.82J,S波形2.78A、142.3V、1.11J;200V时,R波形2.76A、141.2V、1.58J,S波形3.77A、189.4V、2.03J;两者P=0.0001)。在输送的174次电击过程中未发生心律失常或其他并发症。波形变圆可降低输送的峰值电压、电流和能量,而不降低除颤效果。为确定这些变化是否与不适减轻相关,目前正在对房颤患者在电生理研究期间使用这些波形进行转复。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验