Baracskay D, Jarjoura D, Cugino A, Blend D, Rutecki G W, Whittier F C
Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Ohio, USA.
Clin Nephrol. 1997 Apr;47(4):222-8.
In elderly individuals, serum creatinine may remain normal as glomerular filtration rate (gfr) declines. Therefore, the estimation of glomerular filtration utilizing mathematical models incorporates age as an important variable. In order to adjust drug dosages and diagnose renal disease earlier in the elderly, a variety of such simplified estimates of gfr have been applied. Unfortunately, no estimator is as accurate as the cumbersome gold standards (e.g. inulin or iothalamate clearance) and the reliability of each may vary with the particular clinical setting. The purpose of this study was to critically evaluate three commonly used estimators of gfr-i.e., creatinine clearance (CC), Cockroft-Gault (CG), and 100 over serum creatinine (100/SC)-comparing them to iothalamate clearance (IC) in a group of healthy ambulatory geriatric subjects (n = 41; ages 65-85). IC declined 1 ml/min per year of age in our sample. CC demonstrated a similar decline, a correlation of 0.83 with IC, and moderate error relative to IC of 17% at the mean (standard error [SE] = 12.3). In contrast, 100/SC correlated only 0.56 with IC, demonstrated a large positive bias (41 ml/min), and showed no age-related decline. An age correction to 100/SC similar to that utilized in the CG formula was clearly necessary. Despite the age and weight correction used in the CG formula, we found the estimates from it to be inaccurate (correlation = 0.5; SE = 23.8). A simpler age-corrected formula (Est. IC = 1/2 [100/SC] + 88-age) was derived and proved significantly superior to CG in our ambulatory geriatric sample, but still exhibited enough error (SE = 16.4) to question its clinical utility. It appears that serum creatinine based estimates of gfr in the elderly may not provide accurate results.
在老年人中,随着肾小球滤过率(GFR)下降,血清肌酐可能仍保持正常。因此,利用数学模型估算肾小球滤过率时将年龄作为一个重要变量。为了在老年人中更早地调整药物剂量并诊断肾脏疾病,已经应用了多种此类简化的GFR估算方法。不幸的是,没有一种估算方法能像繁琐的金标准(如菊粉或碘他拉酸盐清除率)那样准确,而且每种方法的可靠性可能因具体临床情况而异。本研究的目的是严格评估三种常用的GFR估算方法,即肌酐清除率(CC)、Cockcroft-Gault(CG)和血清肌酐的倒数乘以100(100/SC),并在一组健康的老年门诊受试者(n = 4 在本研究样本中,IC每年下降1 ml/min。CC显示出类似的下降趋势,与IC的相关性为r = 0.83,相对于IC的平均误差为17%(标准误[SE] = 12.3)。相比之下,100/SC与IC的相关性仅为r = 0.56,显示出较大的正偏差(41 ml/min),且未显示出与年龄相关的下降。显然有必要对100/SC进行类似于CG公式中使用的年龄校正。尽管CG公式中使用了年龄和体重校正,但我们发现其估算值并不准确(相关性 = 0.5;SE = 23.8)。我们推导了一个更简单的年龄校正公式(估算的IC = 1/2 [100/SC] + 88 - 年龄),在我们的老年门诊样本中,该公式被证明明显优于CG,但仍存在足够的误差(SE = 16.4),使其临床实用性受到质疑似乎基于血清肌酐估算老年人的GFR可能无法提供准确结果。 1;年龄65 - 85岁)中与碘他拉酸盐清除率(IC)进行比较。